King v. State

Decision Date01 December 1965
Docket NumberNo. 38753,38753
PartiesAustin Norris KING, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
CourtTexas Court of Criminal Appeals

C. C. Divine, Houston, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The offense is murder; the punishment, 25 years.

The indictment alleged the killing of Elgene Carter by shooting her with a gun.

The evidence shows that the deceased was the sister of appellant's wife and that they lived in the same house.

The body of the deceased was lying on a couch in the house when officers responded to a call. Gunshot wounds from a pistol taken from appellant when he presented himself at the police station were shown to have caused her death.

The appellant made no statement connecting him with the killing and no eye witness testified.

The state relied upon circumstantial evidence.

Mattie Green testified that appellant's wife ran into her house through the back door hollering: 'He shot my sister.'

To connect appellant with the murder of his sister-in-law and to show that his wife's res gestae statement referred to him, the state relied upon the testimony of Dan Griffin.

Griffin testified that he was raking hay when he noticed a disturbance across the street.

'Q. What was taking place over there--tell the jury what you saw?

'A. Well, I seen two colored women and one colored man there arguing. It was a vacant house on the side next to the street that runs down to Rodney Green's, and they were living in the next house from that.

'Q. You said you saw two colored women and one colored man?

'A. Yes, sir.

'Q. Where were they when you first noticed them?

'A. They were right along about, oh, I reckon near the center of the house, the vacant house that there wasn't anyone living in.

'Q. Tell the jury, Dan, whether or not you heard some shots? * * *

'A. Yes, sir, I heard some gun shots over there.

'Q. Do you recall how many times?

'A. No, sir, I don't recall how many times it was.

'Q. Tell the jury what you saw the people you described do after the shots were fired?

'A. Well, first I seen a lady come out from around the house and come right on down across the pavement from me, and went right on into Rodney Green's back door, and shut it behind her, shut the door behind her. And then, in just a few minutes, I don't know how many little children it were, they come out from around there hollering and screaming, and going toward Rodney Green's--old man Rodney Green's.

'Q. Tell the jury what the man you saw did?

'A. Well, he stayed around there a pretty good while, and then he come on out from back there, walking, just walking along ordinary. He come on out and set in his car right near Tabor Street, and he set there for a long time, and then all of a sudden he backed out, and the last I seen him he was going back up by the Catholic Church, that was coming on, of course, further up here in town,--I reckon he were coming to give up----

'Q. Okay. I didn't ask you a minute ago, but I want to ask you now, could you tell from where you were the direction that the shots had come from?

'A. No, sir, I couldn't.

'Q. But immediately after the shots you would state to the jury that you saw some activity among these three people you described?

'A. Yes, sir.

'Q. Do you see that man in the Courtroom today?

'A. That man right there (indicating the defendant) looks like he could be his size and his height. He had on a hat.'

The evidence shows that three children of the deceased and her husband were living with her.

Patrolman Henry Johnson, the first officer to arrive at the house,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
20 cases
  • Hankins v. State, 60914
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
    • November 18, 1981
    ...Earnhart v. State, supra; Stogsdill v. State, supra; Hollingsworth v. State, 419 S.W.2d 854 (Tex.Cr.App.1967); King v. State, 396 S.W.2d 409 (Tex.Cr.App.1965); Ramirez v. State, 163 Tex.Cr.R. 109, 289 S.W.2d 251 In 5 Am.Jur.2d, Appeal and Error, § 821, p. 262, it is written: "... And it has......
  • Wilson v. State, 072-82
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
    • March 23, 1983
    ...Ysasaga v. State, 444 S.W.2d 305, 308-309 (Tex.Cr.App.1969); Hollingsworth v. State, 419 S.W.2d 854 (Tex.Cr.App.1967); King v. State, 396 S.W.2d 409 (Tex.Cr.App.1965); Ramirez v. State, 163 Tex.Cr.R. 109, 289 S.W.2d 251 (Tex.Cr.App.1956). See also 24 Tex.Jur.2d, Evidence, § 742, p. 422; 5 A......
  • Anders v. State, 41627
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
    • September 23, 1969
    ...a conviction. 24 Tex.Jur.2d 427, Sec. 745; Hollingsworth v. State, (1967) Tex.Cr.App., 419 S.W.2d 854; King v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 396 S.W.2d 409; Ramirez v. State, 163 Tex.Cr.R. 109, 289 S.W.2d 251, 261 This cause is reversed and remanded to the trial court for retrial. In view of the nece......
  • Gilder v. State, 44342
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
    • January 11, 1972
    ...See also Ysasaga v. State, 444 S.W.2d 305 (Tex.Cr.App.1969); Hollingsworth v. State, 419 S.W.2d 854 (Tex.Cr.App.1967); King v. State, 396 S.W.2d 409 (Tex.Cr.App.1965) Page 727 ; Ramirez v. State, 163 Tex.Cr.R. 109, 289 S.W.2d 251 (1956). I do base my concurrence upon the trial court's failu......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT