King v. U.S., No. 97-B-341.

CourtUnited States District Courts. 10th Circuit. United States District Court of Colorado
Writing for the CourtBabcock
Citation53 F.Supp.2d 1056
PartiesJerry KING, Gail King, Curt Rogers, Aimee King-Rogers, David McGuire and Jennifer McGuire, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America; Community Involved Chartered School; Jefferson County School District R-1; Wayne Emmett McKillop; Nathan Soares; Eli Messer; Loney Martinez; Troy Glandon; Dustin Lacey; Jane Roe 1; Jane Roe 2; and Jane Roe 3, Defendants. Scottsdale Insurance Co., as Subrogee of Linda Farris, Plaintiffs in Intervention, v. Wayne Emmett McKillop; Nathan Soares; Eli Messer; Loney Martinez; Troy Glandon; Dustin Lacey, by and through their respective parents and/or guardians, Defendants. Colorado Casualty Insurance Company, as Subrogee of Barbara McCabe; and Barbara McCabe, Plaintiffs in Intervention, v. Community Involved Chartered School; Jefferson County School District R-1; Wayne Emmett McKillop; Nathan Soares; Eli Messer; Loney Martinez; Troy Glandon; Dustin Lacey; Jane Roe 1; Jane Roe 2; and Jane Roe 3, Defendants.
Decision Date28 May 1999
Docket NumberNo. 97-B-341.
53 F.Supp.2d 1056
Jerry KING, Gail King, Curt Rogers, Aimee King-Rogers, David McGuire and Jennifer McGuire, Plaintiffs,
v.
UNITED STATES of America; Community Involved Chartered School; Jefferson County School District R-1; Wayne Emmett McKillop; Nathan Soares; Eli Messer; Loney Martinez; Troy Glandon; Dustin Lacey; Jane Roe 1; Jane Roe 2; and Jane Roe 3, Defendants.
Scottsdale Insurance Co., as Subrogee of Linda Farris, Plaintiffs in Intervention,
v.
Wayne Emmett McKillop; Nathan Soares; Eli Messer; Loney Martinez; Troy Glandon; Dustin Lacey, by and through their respective parents and/or guardians, Defendants.
Colorado Casualty Insurance Company, as Subrogee of Barbara McCabe; and Barbara McCabe, Plaintiffs in Intervention,
v.
Community Involved Chartered School; Jefferson County School District R-1; Wayne Emmett McKillop; Nathan Soares; Eli Messer; Loney Martinez; Troy Glandon; Dustin Lacey; Jane Roe 1; Jane Roe 2; and Jane Roe 3, Defendants.
No. 97-B-341.
United States District Court, D. Colorado.
May 28, 1999.

Page 1057

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED

Page 1058

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED

Page 1059

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED

Page 1060

Eugene Deikman, Eugene Deikman, P.C., Denver, CO, James R. Florey, Jr., Englewood, CO, Scott A. McGath, William D. Thode, Van Voorhis, McGath & Overturf, P.C., Denver, CO, for plaintiffs.

William J. Kowalski, Colleen A. O'Laughlin, Caplan and Earnest, LLC, Boulder, CO, David J. Nowak, White and Steele, P.C., Denver, CO, Bradley D. Tucker, Walberg & Dagner, P.C., Quebec Centre II, Englewood, CO, Jamey W. Jamison, Harris, Karstaedt, Jamison & Powers, P.C., Englewood, CO, Marc R. Levy, Martha C. Ferris, Stuart D. Morse, Levy & Lambdin, P.C., Englewood, CO, Franklin D. Patterson, Craig S. Nuss, Patterson & Nuss, P.C., Englewood, CO, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BABCOCK, District Judge.


Pending are Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and (6) motions to dismiss filed by defendants United States of America (United States), Community Involved Chartered School

Page 1061

(CICS), Jefferson County School District R-1 (School District), and Wayne Emmett McKillop (Mr. McKillop). After consideration of the motions, responses, and counsels' argument, I will deny the motions in part and grant them in part.

I.
Facts

The following facts are undisputed unless otherwise stated. This case arises out of a forest fire that began on May 18, 1996 in the Pike National Forest near Buffalo Creek in Jefferson County, Colorado. Third Amended Complaint, ¶ 9. The fire destroyed the property, buildings, and dwellings owned and occupied by Plaintiffs Jerry King, Gail King, Curt Rogers, Aimee King-Rogers, David McGuire, and Jennifer McGuire (individual Plaintiffs). Plaintiffs allege that the forest fire started as a result of a campfire built by defendants Soares, Messer, Martinez, Glandon, and Lacey, id. at ¶ 11, students at CICS, a charter school in the School District. Mr. McKillop, a teacher and student advisor at CICS, took sixteen CICS students on a three day camping trip in the Pike National Forest to a site used by he and his wife pursuant to a twenty year "Term Special Use Permit" (Permit) issued by the United States Forest Service. Some of the students stayed in a cabin located on the land while others pitched tents near the cabin and at a site some distance from the cabin. At the more distant campsite, several students built a fire pit for campfires. An ember from one of the campfires apparently started the forest fire.

The following claims are pending:

Page 1062

 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                | Plaintiff | Claim Number | Defendant | Claim |
                |-------------------------|---------------|---------------------------|---------------------------------------|
                | Jerry King, Gail King, | One | United States | Negligence |
                | Curt Rogers, Aimee | | | |
                | King-Rogers, David | | | |
                | McGuire, and Jennifer | | | |
                | McGuire | | | |
                |-------------------------|---------------|---------------------------|---------------------------------------|
                | | Two | McKillop | Negligence |
                |-------------------------|---------------|---------------------------|---------------------------------------|
                | | Three | McKillop | Statutory Liability for |
                | | | | violation of |
                | | | | §§ 13-21-105 and 18-13-109, |
                | | | | C.R.S. |
                |-------------------------|---------------|---------------------------|---------------------------------------|
                | | Four | McKillop, Soares, | Negligent infliction of |
                | | | Messer, Martinez, | emotional distress |
                | | | Glandon, and Lacey | |
                |-------------------------|---------------|---------------------------|---------------------------------------|
                | | Five | CICS | Respondeat superior for |
                | | | | acts and omissions of |
                | | | | McKillop |
                |-------------------------|---------------|---------------------------|---------------------------------------|
                | | Six | School District | Respondeat superior for |
                | | | | acts and omissions of |
                | | | | CICS and McKillop |
                |-------------------------|---------------|---------------------------|---------------------------------------|
                | | Seven | Soares, Messer, Martinez, | Statutory liability for |
                | | | Glandon, and Lacey | violation of |
                | | | | §§ 13-21-105 and 18-13-109, |
                | | | | C.R.S. |
                |-------------------------|---------------|---------------------------|---------------------------------------|
                | | Eight | McKillop, Soares, | Strict liability for |
                | | | Messer, Martinez, | abnormally dangerous |
                | | | Glandon, Lacey, CICS, | activity |
                | | | and School District | |
                |-------------------------|---------------|---------------------------|---------------------------------------|
                | | Nine (sic) | (sic) | no claim pleaded |
                |-------------------------|---------------|---------------------------|---------------------------------------|
                | | Ten | Jane Roes 1, 2, and 3 | Negligence |
                 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                

Page 1063

 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                | Plaintiff in intervention | Defendant | Claim number | Claim |
                |-----------------------------|---------------------------|----------------------|--------------------------------------|
                | Scottsdale | McKillop, Soares, | One | Negligence |
                | | Messer, Martinez, | | |
                | | Glandon, Lacey | | |
                |-----------------------------|---------------------------|----------------------|--------------------------------------|
                | | McKillop | Two | Negligent supervision |
                |-----------------------------|---------------------------|----------------------|--------------------------------------|
                | | McKillop, Soares, | Three | Ultrahazardous activity |
                | | Messer, Martinez, | | |
                | | Glandon, Lacey | | |
                |-----------------------------|---------------------------|----------------------|--------------------------------------|
                | | McKillop, Soares, | Four | Statutory liability for |
                | | Messer, Martinez, | | violation of § 13-21-105, |
                | | Glandon, Lacey | | C.R.S. |
                |-----------------------------|---------------------------|----------------------|--------------------------------------|
                | | McKillop, Soares, | Five | Exemplary damages |
                | | Messer, Martinez, | | |
                | | Glandon, Lacey | | |
                |-----------------------------|---------------------------|----------------------|--------------------------------------|
                | | McKillop | Six | Third-party liability |
                | | | | under Term Special Use |
                | | | | Permit |
                |-----------------------------|---------------------------|----------------------|--------------------------------------|
                | Plaintiff in intervention | Defendant | Claim number | Claim |
                |-----------------------------|---------------------------|----------------------|--------------------------------------|
                | Colorado Casualty | McKillop, Soares, | One | Negligence |
                | | Messer, Martinez, | | |
                | | Glandon, and Lacey | | |
                |-----------------------------|---------------------------|----------------------|--------------------------------------|
                | | CICS | Two | Respondeat superior for |
                | | | | acts and omissions of |
                | | | | McKillop |
                |-----------------------------|---------------------------|----------------------|--------------------------------------|
                | | McKillop, Soares, | Three | Statutory liability for |
                | | Messer, Martinez, | | violation of §§ 13-21-105 |
                | | Glandon, and Lacey | | and 18-13-109, C.R.S. |
                |-----------------------------|---------------------------|----------------------|--------------------------------------|
                | | School District | Four | Respondeat superior for |
                | | | | acts and omissions of |
                | | | [DISMISSED 4/17/98] | McKillop and CICS |
                |-----------------------------|---------------------------|----------------------|--------------------------------------|
                | | McKillop, Soares, | Five | Exemplary damages |
                | | Messer, Martinez, | | |
                | | Glandon, and Lacey | | |
                 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                | Cross-claims of | Defendant | Claim Number | Claim |
                | defendant United States | | | |
                | of America | | | |
                |-----------------------------|---------------------------|----------------------|--------------------------------------|
                | | Soares, Messer, Martinez, | One | Negligence |
                | | Glandon, and Lacey | | |
                |-----------------------------|---------------------------|----------------------|--------------------------------------|
                | | Soares, Messer, Martinez, | Two | Liability pursuant to |
                | | Glandon, and Lacey | | § 13-21-105, C.R.S. |
                |-----------------------------|---------------------------|----------------------|--------------------------------------|
                | | Mckillop | Three | Liability under Term |
                | | | | Special Use Permit |
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 practice notes
  • Middleton v. Hartman, 00SC809.
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court of Colorado
    • April 15, 2002
    ...to the assertion of a claim against a public entity or public employee. Felder, 487 U.S. at 144, 108 S.Ct. 2302; King v. United States, 53 F.Supp.2d 1056, 1081 (D.Colo.1999) (citing City & County of Denver v. Desert Truck Sales, Inc., 837 P.2d 759, 763 (Colo.1992)). Thus, once notice is fil......
  • Dahn v. Adoption Alliance, Civil Action No. 13-cv-02504-RM-CBS
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 10th Circuit. United States District Court of Colorado
    • February 17, 2016
    ...the plaintiff.” C.R.S. § 13–21–102(1)(b) ; O'Hayre v. Bd. of Educ. , 109 F.Supp.2d 1284, 1295 (D.Colo.2000) ; King v. United States , 53 F.Supp.2d 1056, 1073 (D.Colo.1999) ; Zerr v. Johnson , 894 F.Supp. 372, 376 (D.Colo.1995).Taking the allegations in the Amended Complaint as true, and all......
  • Board of County Com'Rs v. Brown Group Retail, Inc., Civil Case No. 08-cv-00855-LTB-KMT.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 10th Circuit. United States District Court of Colorado
    • February 18, 2009
    ...ultra-hazardous—thereby subjecting the actor to strict liability—is a question of law for a court to decide. See King v. United States, 53 F.Supp.2d 1056, 1076 (D.Colo. 1999), rev'd in part on other grounds, 301 F.3d 1270 (10th Cir.2002). In making such a determination, I look to the factor......
  • O'Hayre v. Board of Educ. Jefferson School Dist., CIV.A.99-B-2101.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 10th Circuit. United States District Court of Colorado
    • August 18, 2000
    ...regard to the consequences, or the rights and safety of others, particularly the plaintiff[s].'" See, e.g., King v. United States, 53 F.Supp.2d 1056, 1073 (D.Colo.1999) (citations omitted); Zerr v. Johnson, 894 F.Supp. 372, 376 (D.Colo.1995). Wilful and wanton may "at times even imply an el......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
17 cases
  • Middleton v. Hartman, No. 00SC809.
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court of Colorado
    • April 15, 2002
    ...to the assertion of a claim against a public entity or public employee. Felder, 487 U.S. at 144, 108 S.Ct. 2302; King v. United States, 53 F.Supp.2d 1056, 1081 (D.Colo.1999) (citing City & County of Denver v. Desert Truck Sales, Inc., 837 P.2d 759, 763 (Colo.1992)). Thus, once notice is fil......
  • Dahn v. Adoption Alliance, Civil Action No. 13-cv-02504-RM-CBS
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
    • February 17, 2016
    ...the plaintiff.” C.R.S. § 13–21–102(1)(b) ; O'Hayre v. Bd. of Educ. , 109 F.Supp.2d 1284, 1295 (D.Colo.2000) ; King v. United States , 53 F.Supp.2d 1056, 1073 (D.Colo.1999) ; Zerr v. Johnson , 894 F.Supp. 372, 376 (D.Colo.1995).Taking the allegations in the Amended Complaint as true, and all......
  • Neiberger v. Hawkins, No. Civ.A. 99-B-1120.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
    • November 12, 1999
    ...is treated as a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1). See King v. United States, 53 F.Supp.2d 1056, 1064 (D.Colo. 1999); see also Trinity Broadcasting of Denver, Inc. v. City of Westminster, 848 P.2d 916, 924 (Colo.1993) (immunity under the Col......
  • Board of County Com'Rs v. Brown Group Retail, Inc., Civil Case No. 08-cv-00855-LTB-KMT.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
    • February 18, 2009
    ...ultra-hazardous—thereby subjecting the actor to strict liability—is a question of law for a court to decide. See King v. United States, 53 F.Supp.2d 1056, 1076 (D.Colo. 1999), rev'd in part on other grounds, 301 F.3d 1270 (10th Cir.2002). In making such a determination, I look to the factor......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT