King v. U.S., 97-B-341.
Decision Date | 28 May 1999 |
Docket Number | No. 97-B-341.,97-B-341. |
Citation | 53 F.Supp.2d 1056 |
Parties | Jerry KING, Gail King, Curt Rogers, Aimee King-Rogers, David McGuire and Jennifer McGuire, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America; Community Involved Chartered School; Jefferson County School District R-1; Wayne Emmett McKillop; Nathan Soares; Eli Messer; Loney Martinez; Troy Glandon; Dustin Lacey; Jane Roe 1; Jane Roe 2; and Jane Roe 3, Defendants. Scottsdale Insurance Co., as Subrogee of Linda Farris, Plaintiffs in Intervention, v. Wayne Emmett McKillop; Nathan Soares; Eli Messer; Loney Martinez; Troy Glandon; Dustin Lacey, by and through their respective parents and/or guardians, Defendants. Colorado Casualty Insurance Company, as Subrogee of Barbara McCabe; and Barbara McCabe, Plaintiffs in Intervention, v. Community Involved Chartered School; Jefferson County School District R-1; Wayne Emmett McKillop; Nathan Soares; Eli Messer; Loney Martinez; Troy Glandon; Dustin Lacey; Jane Roe 1; Jane Roe 2; and Jane Roe 3, Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Colorado |
Eugene Deikman, Eugene Deikman, P.C., Denver, CO, James R. Florey, Jr., Englewood, CO, Scott A. McGath, William D. Thode, Van Voorhis, McGath & Overturf, P.C., Denver, CO, for plaintiffs.
William J. Kowalski, Colleen A. O'Laughlin, Caplan and Earnest, LLC, Boulder, CO, David J. Nowak, White and Steele, P.C., Denver, CO, Bradley D. Tucker, Walberg & Dagner, P.C., Quebec Centre II, Englewood, CO, Jamey W. Jamison, Harris, Karstaedt, Jamison & Powers, P.C., Englewood, CO, Marc R. Levy, Martha C. Ferris, Stuart D. Morse, Levy & Lambdin, P.C., Englewood, CO, Franklin D. Patterson, Craig S. Nuss, Patterson & Nuss, P.C., Englewood, CO, for defendants.
Pending are Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and (6) motions to dismiss filed by defendants United States of America (United States), Community Involved Chartered School (CICS), Jefferson County School District R-1 (School District), and Wayne Emmett McKillop (Mr. McKillop). After consideration of the motions, responses, and counsels' argument, I will deny the motions in part and grant them in part.
I.
The following facts are undisputed unless otherwise stated. This case arises out of a forest fire that began on May 18, 1996 in the Pike National Forest near Buffalo Creek in Jefferson County, Colorado. Third Amended Complaint, ¶ 9. The fire destroyed the property, buildings, and dwellings owned and occupied by Plaintiffs Jerry King, Gail King, Curt Rogers, Aimee King-Rogers, David McGuire, and Jennifer McGuire (individual Plaintiffs). Plaintiffs allege that the forest fire started as a result of a campfire built by defendants Soares, Messer, Martinez, Glandon, and Lacey, id. at ¶ 11, students at CICS, a charter school in the School District. Mr. McKillop, a teacher and student advisor at CICS, took sixteen CICS students on a three day camping trip in the Pike National Forest to a site used by he and his wife pursuant to a twenty year "Term Special Use Permit" (Permit) issued by the United States Forest Service. Some of the students stayed in a cabin located on the land while others pitched tents near the cabin and at a site some distance from the cabin. At the more distant campsite, several students built a fire pit for campfires. An ember from one of the campfires apparently started the forest fire.
The following claims are pending:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Middleton v. Hartman
...to the assertion of a claim against a public entity or public employee. Felder, 487 U.S. at 144, 108 S.Ct. 2302; King v. United States, 53 F.Supp.2d 1056, 1081 (D.Colo.1999) (citing City & County of Denver v. Desert Truck Sales, Inc., 837 P.2d 759, 763 (Colo.1992)). Thus, once notice is fil......
-
Neiberger v. Hawkins, Civ.A. 99-B-1120.
...immunity is treated as a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1). See King v. United States, 53 F.Supp.2d 1056, 1064 (D.Colo. 1999); see also Trinity Broadcasting of Denver, Inc. v. City of Westminster, 848 P.2d 916, 924 (Colo.1993) (immunity unde......
-
O'Hayre v. Board of Educ. Jefferson School Dist.
...regard to the consequences, or the rights and safety of others, particularly the plaintiff[s].'" See, e.g., King v. United States, 53 F.Supp.2d 1056, 1073 (D.Colo.1999) (citations omitted); Zerr v. Johnson, 894 F.Supp. 372, 376 (D.Colo.1995). Wilful and wanton may "at times even imply an el......
-
Board of County Com'Rs v. Brown Group Retail, Inc.
...ultra-hazardous—thereby subjecting the actor to strict liability—is a question of law for a court to decide. See King v. United States, 53 F.Supp.2d 1056, 1076 (D.Colo. 1999), rev'd in part on other grounds, 301 F.3d 1270 (10th Cir.2002). In making such a determination, I look to the factor......
-
Inherently Dangerous and Ultrahazardous Activities: Standard of Care and Vicarious Liability
...subjecting the actor to strict liability—is a question of law for a court to decide.”) (citing King v. United States, 53 F.Supp.2d 1056, 1076 (D.Colo. 1999), rev’d in part on other grounds, 301 F.3d 1270 (10th Cir. 2002)). [36] Garden of the Gods Vill., 294 P.2d at 600 (emphasis added). See......
-
Overview of General Liability, Workers' Compensation, and Employment Law Issues in K-12 Educational Institutions
...County School Dist. No. RE-3J, 545 P.2d 1370 (Colo.App. 1975). [3] CRS §§ 24-10-101 etseq. [4] CRS § 24-10-103(5). [5] King v. U.S., 53 F.Supp.2d 1056 (D.Colo. 1999). 6CRS § 24-10-102. [7] CRS § 24-10-118(2)(a). [8] CRS § 24-10-103(4)(a). [9] Smith v. Bd. ofEduc. of School Dist. RE-1, 83 P.......