Kinney v. Heuring
| Decision Date | 02 July 1908 |
| Docket Number | 6,895 |
| Citation | 85 N.E. 369,42 Ind.App. 263 |
| Parties | KINNEY, TRUSTEE, v. HEURING ET AL |
| Court | Indiana Appellate Court |
From Superior Court of Marion County (71,286); James M. Leathers, Judge.
Suit by Martha E. Heuring against Collie E. Kinney, as trustee, and others. From a decree for plaintiff, defendant Kinney appeals. On motion to dismiss appeal. (For decision on merits, see Ind.App. .
Motion overruled.
Collie E. Kinney, for appellant.
Charles Martindale, for appellee.
Appellee moves to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the transcript was not filed within the time fixed by statute. The time for taking appeals under § 672 Burns 1908, § 633 R. S. 1881, begins to run from the date that the motion for a new trial of the cause is overruled. Joyce v. Dickey (1885), 104 Ind. 183, 3 N.E. 252; Moon v. Cline (1895), 11 Ind.App. 460, 39 N.E. 432; New York, etc., R. Co. v. Doane (1886), 105 Ind. 92, 4 N.E. 419. In the case at bar the motion for a new trial was overruled May 17, 1907, the transcript was filed May 18, 1908. The statute (§ 1350 Burns 1908, § 1280 R. S. 1881) provides that the time within which an act is to be done is to be computed by excluding the first day and including the last day. If the last day be Sunday it should be excluded. The last day in the case at bar occurred on Sunday. The transcript was filed in time.
Motion overruled.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Styles v. DiCkey
...v. Duryea, 5 Ariz. 8, 43 Pac. 220;Morgan v. Perkins, 94 Ga. 353, 21 S. E. 574;Close v. Twibell (Ind. App.) 92 N. E. 377;Kinney v. Heuring, 42 Ind. App. 263, 85 N. E. 369;Conklin v. Marshalltown, 66 Iowa, 122, 23 N. W. 294;Webb v. Strobach, 143 Mo. App. 459, 127 S. W. 680, applying to a 10-d......
-
Pittsburgh, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Johnson
...the same. Moon, Trustee, v. Cline, 11 Ind. App. 460, 39 N. E. 432;Wheeler v. Barr, 6 Ind. App. 530, 33 N. E. 975;Kinney v. Heuring, 42 Ind. App. 263, 85 N. E. 369. In the case of Reading v. Brown, 19 Ind. App. 90, at pages 90 and 91, 49 N. E. 41, at page 42, this court said: “Our Supreme Co......
-
Styles v. Dickey
...5 Ariz. 8, 43 P. 220; Morgan v. Perkins, 94 Ga. 353, 21 S.E. 574; Close v. Twibell, 47 Ind.App. 290, 92 N.E. 377; Kinney v. Heuring, 42 Ind.App. 263, 85 N.E. 369; Conklin v. Marshalltown, 66 Iowa 122, 23 N.W. Webb v. Strobach, 143 Mo.App. 459, 127 S.W. 680, applying to a ten-day ordinance p......
-
Kinney v. Heuring
...From a decree providing for the payment of outstanding liens from the proceeds of the property, the trustee appeals. Affirmed. See, also, 85 N. E. 369.Collie E. Kinney, in pro. per. Chas. Martindale, for appellees.RABB, J. The questions presented in this case arise upon exceptions to conclu......