Kinney v. Steiner Bros.

CourtAlabama Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtANDERSON, J.
CitationKinney v. Steiner Bros., 167 Ala. 494, 52 So. 593 (Ala. 1910)
Decision Date12 May 1910
PartiesKINNEY v. STEINER BROS.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Jefferson County; A. H. Benners Chancellor.

Bill by Steiner Bros. against F. H. Kinney to quiet title to certain lands. From a decree for complainants, respondent appeals. Reversed and rendered.

Stallings & Drennen, for appellant.

A Latady, for appellees.

ANDERSON J.

To maintain a bill under the statute for the determination of claims to real estate and to quiet title thereto, it is necessary for the complainants to aver and prove that at the time of the institution of the suit the complainants' possession of the land involved was peaceable, as contradistinguished from disputed or contested, possession and that it was under claim of ownership. Lyon v Arndt, 142 Ala. 486, 38 So. 242; Randle v Daughdrill, 142 Ala. 490, 39 So. 162. We think the complainants' possession was, at best, a mere scrambling one, attempted for the purpose of making the respondent the actor in the courts. It was undisputed that the land is wild or timber land, that respondent had it inclosed with a barb-wire fence, and to all intents and purposes was in possession; and complainants' counsel admitted as a witness that he advised the planting of oats on the land for the purpose of compelling the proprietor of the fence to resort to an action of ejectment. The effort made to suddenly transform this forest, or densely timbered piece of land, into a flourishing oat field in so short a time, did not, we think, materialize to the extent of terminating the respondent's possession. The oats may have been sown, but there was no proof that they came up or were harvested. Indeed, the weight of evidence is that the planting was a mere sham for the purpose of dispossessing the respondent, and that what was done gave no signs that the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • Chestang v. Tensaw Land & Timber Co.
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • September 8, 1960
    ...568 (citing 5 earlier Alabama cases). See, also, Hinds v. Federal Land Bank of New Orleans, 237 Ala. 218, 186 So. 153; Kinney v. Steiner Bros., 167 Ala. 494, 52 So. 593; Holland v. Coleman, 162 Ala. 462, 50 So. 128; Lyon v. Arndt, 142 Ala. 486, 38 So. 242. 'It is also clear that to constitu......
  • Carr v. Moore
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • May 15, 1919
    ... ... 985; Pritchard v ... Fowler, 171 Ala. 662, 667, 55 So. 147; Williamson v ... Mayer Bros., 117 Ala. 253, 23 So. 3. Respondents, being ... called upon to propound their claim and failing ... 324, 54 ... So. 114; Sayers v. Tallassee Falls Mfg. Co., 167 ... Ala. 553, 52 So. 892; Kinney v. Steiner Bros., 167 ... Ala. 494, 52 So. 593; Vandegrift v. Sou. Min. Land ... Co., 166 Ala ... ...
  • Hicks v. Stone
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • February 7, 1924
    ... ... Arndt, 142 Ala. 486, 38 So. 242; Randle v ... Daughdrill, 142 Ala. 490, 39 So. 162." Kinney v ... Steiner Bros., 167 Ala. 494, 495, 52 So. 593 ... In ... Burgin v. Hodge, 207 ... ...
  • Brookside-Pratt Mining Co. v. Wright
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • April 8, 1937
    ... ... Arndt, 142 Ala. 486, 38 So. 242; Randle v ... Daughdrill, 142 Ala. 490, 39 So. 162; Kinney v ... Steiner Bros., 167 Ala. 494, 52 So. 593; Burgin v ... Hodge, 207 Ala. 315, 93 So. 27; ... ...
  • Get Started for Free