Kinningham v. The State, 14,910
| Citation | 21 N.E. 911, 119 Ind. 332 |
| Case Date | June 08, 1889 |
| Court | Supreme Court of Indiana |
From the Decatur Circuit Court.
Judgment reversed.
J. S. Scobey, for appellant.
L. T. Michener, Attorney General, and J. H. Gillett, for the State.
Several objections are urged against the indictment upon which the appellant was convicted, but we deem it necessary to notice only one of them. The indictment charges in general terms that the defendant did "unlawfully, feloniously and wilfully attempt to set fire to and burn and destroy a certain frame building, commonly called a barn." No act is charged, and the indictment is radically bad. The charge that the defendant did attempt to do a designated thing is really little more than an averment that he intended to do the thing, and to constitute crime there must be both an act and a guilty intention. Where it is sought to charge an accused with a crime, the acts done by him must be stated. 1 Bishop Crim. Law, section 659.
Judgment reversed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Wright v. Hughes
... ... policy-holders, and without any amendment of the articles of ... association, or the consent of the State. In January, 1882, ... the board of directors again resolved to continue the scheme ... of retiring the company's life policies, and the ... ...
-
Staser v. Hogan
... ... appeal to this court and assign as error: ... 1st ... That the complaint does not state facts sufficient to ... constitute a cause of action ... 2d. No ... paragraph of the complaint states facts sufficient to ... ...
- Kinningham v. The State