Kinsey v. Union Traction Co.
| Decision Date | 27 June 1907 |
| Docket Number | No. 20,471.,20,471. |
| Citation | Kinsey v. Union Traction Co., 169 Ind. 563, 81 N.E. 922 (Ind. 1907) |
| Parties | KINSEY v. UNION TRACTION CO. et al. |
| Writing for the Court | JORDAN |
| Court | Indiana Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from Superior Court, Marion County; Vinson Carter, Judge.
Action by Lottie A. Kinsey against the Union Traction Company and others. From a judgment of dismissal rendered after sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, plaintiff appeals. Reversed and remanded.Gavin & Davis, for appellant. F. Winter, W. H. Latta, Jas. A. Van Osdol, and F. E. Matson, for appellees.
Appellant, as plaintiff below, on July 28, 1903, commenced this action against appellees, the Union Traction Company, the Indiana Union Traction Company, the Indianapolis Northern Traction Company, the Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Company, and the Indianapolis Street Railway Company. These parties demurred separately and severally to the complaint on the ground of insufficiency of facts. The court sustained the demurrers, to each of which rulings appellant excepted, and, declining to plead further, judgment was accordingly rendered against her. She appeals, and relies for reversal upon the alleged erroneous rulings of the court in sustaining the demurrers in question. By her complaint she charges and alleges that she is, and for five years last past has been, the owner in fee simple of the following described real estate, to wit: Lots 55 and 56 in Ovid Butler's addition to College Corner, all of which real estate is situated in the city of Indianapolis, Marion county, state of Indiana. This real estate, for a distance of 70 feet, fronts and abuts, at the corner of Fifteenth street, upon College avenue, a public street in said city, and runs thence west 160 feet to an alley. It is averred that plaintiff owns as a part of her said real estate the fee simple of the ground in front of her premises extending to the center of said College avenue. For the past five years, plaintiff has had upon the front part of her lot, and within 60 feet of the center of said avenue, a frame house consisting of 15 rooms, constructed and used by her and her family as a dwelling during all of said time; her family so occupying the same consisting of herself and husband, with their children and small grandchildren.
It is further alleged that:
...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Bremer v. St. Paul City Ry. Co.
...rights at public or private crossings; a street is used concurrently by the street car company and by the public. Kinsey v. Traction Co. (Ind. Sup.) 81 N. E. 922;I. T. & T. R. R. Co. v. Kidd, 167 Ind. 402, 79 N. E. 347,7 L. R. A. (N. S.) 143 (collecting cases at page 145); Atty. Gen. v. Met......
-
Motoramp Garage Co. v. City of Tacoma
... ... v ... Huntsinger, 14 Ind.App. 156, 39 N.E. 423, 42 N.E. 640, ... and in Kinsey v. Union Traction Co., 169 Ind. 563, ... 81 N.E. 922, the construction of natural gas pipe ... ...
-
Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co. v. Kinney
...under consideration applies to street railroads. But see majority opinion of Justices Gillett, Monks, and Hadley in Kinsey v. Union Traction Co., 169 Ind. 601, 81 N. E. 922;Funk v. Railway Co., 61 Minn. 435, 63 N. W. 1099, 29 L R. A. 208, 52 Am. St. Rep. 608;Riley v. City Ry. Co., 13 Tex. C......
-
Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co. v. Kinney
... ... by employes, in preparing for, and during, the movement and ... operation of railroad trains. Indianapolis Union R ... Co. v. Houlihan (1901), 157 Ind. 494, 60 N.E ... 943, 54 L.R.A. 787. Such classification cannot be arbitrarily ... made. There must exist ... railroads; but see majority opinion of Justices Gillett, ... Monks and Hadley in Kinsey v. Union Traction ... Co. (1908), 169 Ind. 563, 601, 81 N.E. 922. See, also, ... Funk v. St. Paul City R. Co. (1895), 61 ... Minn. 435, 63 N.W ... ...