Kirby v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary, 7735.

Decision Date13 November 1958
Docket NumberNo. 7735.,7735.
Citation261 F.2d 345
PartiesJohn E. KIRBY, Appellant, v. WARDEN, MARYLAND PENITENTIARY, Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit

Walter E. Black, Jr., Baltimore, Md. (H. B. Mutter, Baltimore, Md., on the brief), Court appointed counsel, for appellant.

James H. Norris, Jr., Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen. of Maryland (C. Ferdinand Sybert, Atty. Gen. of Maryland, on the brief), for appellee.

Before SOBELOFF, Chief Judge, and SOPER and HAYNSWORTH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court denying a petition of the appellant, John E. Kirby, for writ of habeas corpus based on the ground that he was imprisoned under sentences of the Criminal Court of Baltimore on charges of robbery with a deadly weapon, after a trial which had been unduly delayed in violation of his constitutional right to a speedy trial.

Kirby was indicted in the Criminal Court of Baltimore on two charges of robbery with a deadly weapon, committed on August 21, 1948. The indictments were returned on May 17 and June 5, 1956, respectively. He was tried for these offenses in July 1956, and found guilty and sentenced to twenty years imprisonment in each case, the sentences to run consecutively.

During the period between 1948 and 1956, Kirby was serving a sentence of nine years in the Federal Penitentiary at Atlanta, imposed on November 22, 1948, under a conviction in Washington, District of Columbia. The record shows that in 1951, during his incarceration, and also in 1952 and 1953, he made several requests of the Maryland authorities to be brought to trial on the Maryland charges and he was informed that he had not been brought from Washington to Baltimore to stand trial under the Baltimore indictments before he was sent to the Federal prison in Atlanta because the Federal authorities in Washington refused to turn him over for trial in Baltimore.

When he was finally tried and convicted for the Maryland offense in July 1956, he took no appeal to the Court of Appeals of Maryland. But on February 8, 1957, he filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Baltimore City Court, which was denied, and he then made application for leave to appeal to the Maryland Court of Appeals, which was also denied. See Kirby v. Warden, 214 Md. 600, 133 A.2d 421. In its decision the court denied the application for appeal but, nevertheless, considered the merits of the petitioner's contention and held that...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Kirby v. State
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • 17 May 1960
    ...Court for the District of Maryland and was turned down by Judge Thomsen because he had waived his rights to a speedy trial. In Kirby v. Warden, 261 F.2d 345, 346, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit noted that the ground relied on by Kirby for the issuance of the writ ......
  • Gowen v. Wilkerson
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Virginia
    • 1 October 1973
    ...right to refrain from testifying, as far as the power of this court to review that act is concerned. Cf. Kirby v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary, 261 F.2d 345 (4th Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 938, 79 S.Ct. 654, 3 L.Ed.2d 639 (1959). See also Chavez v. State of New Mexico, 456 F.2d 107......
  • Spriggs v. State of North Carolina
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of North Carolina
    • 9 July 1965
    ...application is fatal to relief in a habeas corpus proceeding. Williams v. Steiner, 213 F. Supp. 600 (D.C.Md.1963); Kirby v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary, 4 Cir., 261 F.2d 345, cert. den. 359 U.S. 938, 79 S.Ct. 654, 3 L.Ed.2d 639 The Court finds that petitioner has not been denied his const......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT