Kirk v. Schaeffler Group USA, Inc.

Docket Number16-3417
Decision Date05 April 2018
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
30 cases
  • Microsource, LLC v. ECO World Grp., LLC
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Iowa
    • February 23, 2022
    ...with competing expert testimony and cross-examination, rather than excluded by the court at the outset." Kirk v. Schaeffler Grp. USA, Inc. , 887 F.3d 376, 391 (8th Cir. 2018) (quoting Johnson v. Mead Johnson & Co. , 754 F.3d 557, 562 (8th Cir. 2014) ). For example, the Court can exclude an ......
  • Bowers v. CSX Transp.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • November 3, 2023
    ... BOWERS v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. No. A23A0839 Court of Appeals of Georgia November 3, 2023 ... Kirk v. Schaeffler Group USA , 887 F.3d 376, 392 (II) ... ...
  • Vacca v. Mo. Dep't of Labor & Indus. Relations
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 19, 2019
    ...or to delineate each and every possible exception." (Internal citations omitted).The Eighth Circuit in Kirk v. Schaeffler Group USA, Inc., 887 F.3d 376 (8th Cir. 2018), has offered a similarly simple explanation of how a federal court should determine whether to apply judicial estoppel afte......
  • Hahn v. Monsanto Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • July 7, 2022
    ...award and remands the case with instructions to hold a new trial only on the issue of punitive damages. See Kirk v. Schaeffler Grp. USA, Inc. , 887 F.3d 376, 390 (8th Cir. 2018) ("A partial new trial on damages is permitted by Rule 59(a)(1) .... [W]e have often remanded for retrial of punit......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Evidence
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Trial Objections
    • May 5, 2022
    ...for public records and need no sponsoring witness.” EVIDENCE 3-57 Evidence: Documentary Evidence §314 Kirk v. Schaeffler Group, Inc. , 887 F.3d 376, 2 (8th Cir. 2018). District court acted within its discretion in admitting public health regulatory standards for trichloroethylene (TCE), und......