Kirk v. State
| Decision Date | 08 June 1915 |
| Docket Number | 340 |
| Citation | Kirk v. State, 13 Ala.App. 316, 69 So. 350 (Ala. App. 1915) |
| Parties | KIRK v. STATE. |
| Court | Alabama Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Clay County Court; E.J. Garrison, Judge.
Dee Kirk was convicted of grand larceny, and he appeals.Affirmed.
William L. Martin, Atty. Gen., and J.P. Mudd, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
The indictment upon which the defendant was tried and convicted contains but one count, and is drawn to charge grand larceny under the section of the Code defining that offense (Code, § 7324).It charges that the pistol stolen was the property of one G.A. Mattison, and that it was stolen by the defendant from a warehouse of the "Ashland Oil Mill & Fertilize Company, a corporation."
It was shown without conflict in the evidence that the Ashland Oil Mill & Fertilizer Company had one warehouse used for storing seed, called the seed warehouse, and another for storing meal and hulls; that near by was yet another building under separate roof having two rooms connected by a door, one of the rooms being used as an office, and the connecting room used for storing minor supplies for the mill, such as ribs for the gin, packing, ropes, belting, and other supplies and articles for repair and keeping up the machinery connected with the plant.The pistol was stolen from a desk in the room in this building used as an office.The room in the building connected by a door with the office, used for storing supplies, etc., was a warehouse within the meaning of the statute, and the office under the same roof connected...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Cook v. State, 6 Div. 489
...v. State, 11 Ala.App. 134, 66 So. 126, cert. denied, 191 Ala. 662, 66 So. 1008 (1914); "fertilize" for "fertilizer", Kirk v. State, 13 Ala.App. 316, 69 So. 350 (1915); "fraudulently" for "fraudelently", Bell v. State, 139 Ala. 124, 35 So. 1021 (1904); "innocense" for "innocence", Mitchell v......
-
Durden v. State
...et al v. State (Ala. App.) 91 So. 911; Holland v. State, 11 Ala. App. 134, 66 So. 126; Id., 191 Ala. 662, 66 So. 1008; Kirk v. State, 13 Ala. App. 316, 69 So. 350; Brown v. State, 15 Ala. App. 611, 74 So. The judgment of the court, after a recital of the verdict of the jury, states that it ......
-
Espey v. State
...misprision which in no way changes the word or obscures the meaning intended. Curry v. State, 23 Ala.App. 182, 122 So. 298; Kirk v. State, 13 Ala.App. 316, 69 So. 350; Holland v. State, 11 Ala.App. 134, 137, 66 So. Sanders v. State, 2 Ala.App. 13, 17, 56 So. 69; Griffith v. State, 90 Ala. 5......
- Smith v. State