Kirk v. Tyrone Township
| Decision Date | 27 March 1974 |
| Docket Number | No. 55494,55494 |
| Citation | Kirk v. Tyrone Township, 216 N.W.2d 50, 391 Mich. 792 (Mich. 1974) |
| Parties | Clara L. KIRK and Amuel M. Kirk, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. TOWNSHIP OF TYRONE, a Michigan governmental corporation, Defendant-Appellant. 391 Mich. 792, 216 N.W.2d 50 |
| Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
Before the Entire Bench.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal by defendant and appellant is considered, and the same hereby is granted. On its own motion, the Court hereby vacates the opinion of the Court of Appeals in this cause and remands the cause to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of Kropf v. City of Sterling Heights, ...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
2 cases
-
People v. Charles
...this standard must be satisfied to invoke the rule in Heard. People v. Justice, 50 Mich.App. 55, 212 N.W.2d 762 (1973), lv. den., 391 Mich. 792 (1974). Understandably in the present case, no objection to the trial court's ruling and instruction was made. Therefore, we have closely examined ......
-
People v. White
...People v. Hempton, 43 Mich.App. 618, 204 N.W.2d 684 (1972); People v. Justice, 50 Mich.App. 55, 212 N.W.2d 762 (1973), lv. den., 391 Mich. 792 (1974). See also Judge Cavanagh's dissent in People v. Banks, supra. Even the Supreme Court has adopted this approach. People v. Haggitt, 388 Mich. ......