Kirschner v. Shareholders (In re Tribune Co. Fraudulent Conveyance Litig.)

Decision Date20 August 2021
Docket Number19-449-cv,August Term 2020,Docket Nos. 19-3049-cv
Citation10 F.4th 147
Parties IN RE: TRIBUNE COMPANY FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE LITIGATION Marc S. Kirschner, as Litigation Trustee for the Tribune Litigation Trust, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Large Shareholders, Financial Advisors, Financial Institution Holders, Financial Institution Conduits, Pension Funds, Individual Beneficial Owners, Mutual Funds, Defendants-Appellees. Marc S. Kirschner, as Litigation Trustee for the Tribune Litigation Trust, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit

Lawrence S. Robbins (Roy T. Englert, Jr., on the brief), Robbins, Russell, Englert, Orseck, Untereiner & Sauber LLP, Washington, DC; Robert J. Lack, Jeffrey R. Wang, Friedman Kaplan Seiler & Adelman LLP, New York, New York; David M. Zensky, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, New York, New York, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Douglas Hallward-Driemeir, (Jonathan Ference-Burke on the brief), Ropes & Gray LLP, Washington, DC; Andrew Devore, Joshua Sturm, Ropes & Gray LLP, Boston, MA; Philip D. Anker, Alan E. Schoenfeld, Ryan Chabot, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP, New York, New York; Joel W. Millar, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP, Washington, DC; Matthew L. Fornshell, Ice Miller LLP, Columbus, Ohio; Andrew J. Entwistle, Entwistle & Cappucci LLP, New York, New York; Mark A. Neubauer, Carlton Fields, LLP, Los Angeles, California; P. Sabin Willett, Michael C. D'Agostino, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Boston, Massachusetts; Michael S. Doluisio, Dechert LLP, Philadelphia, Pennyslvania, for Defendants-Appellees Pension Funds, Financial Institution Holders, Individual Beneficial Owners, Mutual Funds, Certain Large Shareholders, and Financial Institution Conduits.

Erin E. Murphy, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC; Gabor Balassa, Brian Borchard, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Chicago, Illinois; Oscar Garza, Douglas G. Levin, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Irvine, California; Matthew D. McGill, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Washington, D.C., for Defendants-Appellees Large Shareholders.

Kannon K. Shanmugam (Masha G. Hansford, Joel S. Johnson, on the brief), Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, Washington, D.C.; Andrew G. Gordon, Kira A. Davis, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, New York, New York; Daniel L. Cantor, Daniel S. Shamah, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, New York, New York, for Defendants-Appellees Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Snith Inc.

Jonathan D. Polkes (Gregory Silbert, Stacy Nettleton, on the brief), Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, New York, New York; George E. Mastoris, Winston & Strawn LLP, New York, New York, for Defendants-Appellees Financial Advisors.

Before: Raggi and Chin, Circuit Judges.*

Chin, Circuit Judge:

In 2007, the Tribune Company ("Tribune"), then-publicly traded, executed a leveraged buyout (the "LBO") to go private. Less than a year later, Tribune filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Plaintiff-appellant Marc Kirschner, the bankruptcy litigation trustee (the "Trustee"), brought fraudulent conveyance and other claims on behalf of creditors against shareholders who sold their stock in the LBO and against the financial advisors that helped Tribune navigate and complete the LBO. In several orders and decisions, the district court dismissed the Trustee's claims for failure to state a claim pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM in part, VACATE in part , and REMAND for further proceedings.

BACKGROUND
I. The Facts

The facts alleged in the operative complaints are assumed to be true for purposes of this appeal.2

Prior to its bankruptcy in 2008, Tribune was a media company that owned numerous radio and television stations and major national newspapers, including The Chicago Tribune , The Los Angeles Times , and The Baltimore Sun . In 2005, the newspaper publishing industry faced severe decline and, by 2006, Tribune, which derived approximately 75% of its total revenues from such publishing, started faltering financially. In September 2006, Tribune's board of directors (the "Board") created a special committee (the "Special Committee") to consider ways to return value to Tribune's shareholders. The Special Committee was comprised of all seven of the Board's independent directors (the "Independent Directors").

A. Tribune Retains Advisors

Before the formation of the Special Committee, the Board hired two financial advisors, defendant-appellee Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, and Smith, Inc. ("Merrill Lynch") on October 17, 2005 and defendant-appellee Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. ("Citigroup") on October 26, 2005, to conduct a strategic review and to recommend possible responses to the ongoing changes in the media industry. Both Merrill Lynch and Citigroup signed engagement letters, which promised each a "Success Fee" of $12.5 million if a "Strategic Transaction" was completed. The engagement letters also allowed each firm to play a role in helping to finance any such "Strategic Transaction," despite the potential conflict of interest inherent in the firms' distinct roles in any such deal. The engagement letters further specified that neither Merrill Lynch nor Citigroup was a fiduciary.

On October 17, 2006, the Special Committee hired Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC f/k/a Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc. ("Morgan Stanley") to serve as its independent financial advisor. Morgan Stanley's engagement letter specified that the firm owed no fiduciary duty to Tribune.

B. Proposed LBO

In early 2007, Sam Zell, an investor, proposed to take Tribune private. At this time, defendants-appellees Chandler Trust No. 1, Chandler Trust No. 2, and certain Chandler sub-trusts (collectively, the "Chandler Trusts") held approximately 20% of Tribune's publicly-held shares. The Robert R. McCormick Foundation and the Cantigny Foundation (collectively, the "Foundations") held another 13% of shares. The Special Committee sought the views of the Chandler Trusts and the Foundations (together, the "Large Shareholders") on Zell's proposal. Concerned that Tribune's stock price would fall before they could sell their shares, the Large Shareholders indicated that they would only vote for a two-step LBO that allowed them to cash out during the first step. In response, Zell suggested a two-step LBO, in which, at Step One, Tribune would borrow money to buy back roughly half of its shares and, at Step Two, Tribune would borrow more money to purchase all remaining shares. Tribune would then merge with a specially created shell corporation. The new entity would become an S Corporation, resulting in nearly $1 billion in anticipated tax savings. In considering whether to approve the LBO, the Board consulted Citigroup and Merrill Lynch.

To secure financing for the LBO, Tribune needed an opinion stating that it would be solvent after each step of the proposed LBO. On February 13, 2007, the Board hired Duff & Phelps to provide such a solvency opinion. Toward that end, Tribune gave Duff & Phelps financial projections predicting that Tribune would fare better in the second half of 2007 as compared to the same period from the year prior (the "February Projections"). These figures were created by Tribune's management team, which, according to the Trustee, had a conflict of interest because its members stood to cash out Tribune shares worth $36 million and reap other gains if an LBO were executed.

After conducting its analysis, Duff & Phelps concluded it could not provide a solvency opinion without considering the $1 billion in tax savings that Tribune expected at Step Two. Duff & Phelps, however, also determined that considering such tax savings in a solvency opinion was not appropriate. Accordingly, on April 1, 2007, Duff & Phelps instead provided a "viability opinion," which concluded that the fair market value of Tribune's assets would exceed its liabilities after the close of the LBO.

The same day, Morgan Stanley and Merrill Lynch issued fairness opinions that the price to be paid for Tribune's stock was fair. These opinions were filed with the SEC as proxy statements. Also, on April 1, 2007, the Special Committee unanimously voted to recommend the two-step LBO, which the Board ultimately approved.

C. Implementation of LBO

Still in need of a solvency opinion to secure financing for the approved LBO, Tribune approached Houlihan Lokey, which declined, on March 29, 2007, to bid for the engagement. On April 11, 2007, Tribune retained Valuation Research Company ("VRC") to provide two solvency opinions, one for Step One and one for Step Two. To secure the engagement, VRC, "a virtually unknown firm," agreed to use a non-standard approach in formulating its solvency opinions. 3049 Appellant's Br. at 12–13.3 VRC charged Tribune $1.5 million -- VRC's highest fee ever for such an engagement -- to issue the solvency opinions.

On May 24, 2007, VRC issued an opinion that Tribune would be solvent after completing Step One. According to the Trustee, however, after VRC issued this solvency opinion, Tribune's management team realized that the February Projections, upon which VRC's opinion was based, were no longer an accurate forecast of Tribune's 2007 second half performance. No one alerted VRC that Tribune was unlikely to meet the February Projections. Indeed, the Trustee alleges that Citigroup and Merrill Lynch reviewed VRC's solvency analysis but "failed to fulfill their responsibilities as ‘gatekeepers’ retained to objectively analyze the LBO." 449 Appellant's Br. at 8.

Despite the issue with VRC's solvency opinion, Tribune delivered it to the financing banks on June 4, 2007. That same day, Step One closed. Tribune borrowed $7 billion to pay off its existing bank debt and to complete a tender offer, buying back just over half of its publicly held shares. The Large Shareholders sold all their...

To continue reading

Request your trial
34 cases
  • Maxus Liquidating Trust v. YPF S.A. (In re Maxus Energy Corp.)
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — District of Delaware
    • June 22, 2022
    ... ... Fraudulent Transfers ... 509 i. Actual Fraudulent ... Maxus's prior asset sales to its shareholders constituted fraudulent transfers, and that Repsol ... considered whether actual fraudulent conveyance claims based on eleven transactions approved in ... See also Kirschner v. Large Shareholders (In re Trib. Co. Fraudulent Conv. Litig.) , 10 F.4th 147, 161 (2d Cir. 2021), cert ... to plausibly allege that the intent of Tribune's senior management should be imputed to the ... ...
  • Halperin v. Morgan Stanley Inv. Mgmt., Inc. (In re Tops Holding II Corp.)
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Southern District of New York
    • October 12, 2022
    ... ... -- show that (a) Tops acted with fraudulent intent in issuing the dividends and (b) its ... law -- directors or controlling shareholders -- and therefore it is the intent of those ... one held at the time of the fraudulent conveyance," 94 or, under some applicable fraudulent ... the courts in the Circuit's most recent Tribune decisions 283 and in Nine West 284 and ... , and indeed it was rejected in Greektown Litig. Trust v. Papas ( In re Greektown Hldgs., LLC ... N.D.N.Y., July 8, 2022). 81 Kirschner v. FitzSimons ( In re Tribune Co. Fraudulent ... ...
  • Smalls v. Collins
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • August 20, 2021
  • Murrell v. Pro Custom Solar LLC
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • January 6, 2022
    ...12(b)(6).” Konrad v. Epley, No. 12 CV 4021, 2013 WL 6200009, at *20 (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 25, 2013); In re Tribune Co. Fraudulent Conv. Litig., 10 F.4th 147, 175 (2d Cir. 2021). Thus, a proposed amendment is futile if it does not “state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” Ashcroft v.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 firm's commentaries
  • The Year In Bankruptcy: 2021
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • January 28, 2022
    ...by retaining the property after the filing of a bankruptcy petition. Avoidance of Transfers. In In re Trib. Co. Fraudulent Conv. Litig., 10 F.4th 147 (2d Cir. 2021), reh'g denied, No. 19-3049 (2d Cir. Oct. 7, 2021), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit largely upheld lower court......
  • U.S. Supreme Court Bankruptcy Roundup
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • April 5, 2022
    ...professional malpractice in connection with Tribune's failed 2007 leveraged buyout ("LBO"). See In re Trib. Co. Fraudulent Conv. Litig., 10 F.4th 147 (2d Cir. 2021), cert. denied sub nom. Kirschner v. Fitzsimons, No. 21-1006, 2022 WL 516021 (U.S. Feb. 22, In Trib. Co., the Second Circuit af......
  • The Year In Bankruptcy: 2021
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • January 28, 2022
    ...by retaining the property after the filing of a bankruptcy petition. Avoidance of Transfers. In In re Trib. Co. Fraudulent Conv. Litig., 10 F.4th 147 (2d Cir. 2021), reh'g denied, No. 19-3049 (2d Cir. Oct. 7, 2021), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit largely upheld lower court......
  • Second Circuit Adopts "Control Test" For Imputation Of Fraudulent Intent In Bankruptcy Avoidance Litigation
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • November 16, 2021
    ...and preferential transfers, breach of fiduciary duties, and professional malpractice. In In re Trib. Co. Fraudulent Conv. Litig., 10 F.4th 147 (2d Cir. 2021), reh'g en banc denied, No. 19-3049 (2d Cir. Oct. 7, 2021), the Second Circuit affirmed four district court rulings dismissing the liq......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT