Kissinger v. Foti
| Decision Date | 10 January 1977 |
| Docket Number | No. 76-2379,76-2379 |
| Citation | 544 F.2d 1257 |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
| Parties | William R. KISSINGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles C. FOTI, etc., et al., Defendants-Appellees. Summary Calendar. * |
William R. Kissinger, pro se.
T. Allen Usry, New Orleans, La., for defendants-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.
Before AINSWORTH, CLARK and RONEY, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiff prisoner filed an action under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 for damages for an alleged beating incident in a Louisiana jail on or about April 18, 1974. Suit was not filed until February 12, 1976, greatly in excess of one year from the alleged tort.
In actions such as this, since Section 1983 has no provision limiting the time within which an action may be brought, the applicable statute of limitations is that which the state would apply if suit for similar relief had been brought in state court. O'Sullivan v. Felix, 233 U.S. 318, 34 S.Ct. 596, 58 L.Ed. 980 (1914); McGuire v. Baker, 421 F.2d 895 (5th Cir. 1970); Knowles v. Carson, 419 F.2d 369 (5th Cir. 1969). The one-year prescriptive period of the Louisiana Civ.Code Art. 3536 governs tort actions for assault and battery in Louisiana. "There is no general rule of law in Louisiana either legislative or judicial providing for the interruption or suspension of the prescriptive period because of imprisonment. . . ." Whitsell v. Rodrigues, 351 F.Supp. 1042, 1044 (E.D.La.1972).
Plaintiff's arguments that he is a "layman-at-law," a pauper without legal assistance, imprisoned, and has continuously sought administrative relief from various state and federal agencies afford him no defense to the absolute bar of the statute of limitations. The district court properly dismissed plaintiff's complaint.
AFFIRMED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Miller v. Smith, 77-2610
...state prescribed for suits seeking similar relief in state courts. E. g., Proctor v. Flex, 567 F.2d 635 (5 Cir., 1978); Kissinger v. Foti, 544 F.2d 1257 (5 Cir., 1977); Knowles v. Carson, 419 F.2d 369 (5 Cir., The Texas tolling statute (Footnote 3, supra ) was last amended effective January......
-
Winton v. Burton
...462, 95 S.Ct. 1716, 1721, 44 L.Ed.2d 295 (1975); Major v. Arizona State Prison, 642 F.2d 311, 312 (9th Cir. 1981); Kissinger v. Foti, 544 F.2d 1257, 1258 (5th Cir.1977). Indeed, the Civil Rights Act specifically provides for this borrowing procedure. See 42 U.S.C. § Winton's allegations in ......
-
Thomas v. Cain
...Article 3492; Elzy v. Roberson, 868 F.2d 793 (5th Cir. 1989); Washington v. Breaux, 782 F.2d 553 (5th Cir. 1986); Kissinger v. Foti, 544 F.2d 1257, 1258 (5th Cir. 1977). Plaintiff signed his complaint on October 7, 2013 and it was filed on October 10, 2013. Ordinarily, any claim the plainti......
-
Campbell v. Bergeron, Civ. A. No. 77-343-B.
...period for bringing actions under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, federal courts must look to and apply the law of the state. Kissinger v. Foti, 544 F.2d 1257 (5th Cir. 1977); Proctor v. Flex, 567 F.2d 635 (5th Cir. Article 3536 of the Louisiana Revised Civil Code establishes a one-year prescriptive peri......