Kissm Realty Corp. v. Brooklyn Cmty. Mgmt., LLC
| Decision Date | 10 June 2015 |
| Docket Number | 2013-03999, 2013-09441 |
| Parties | KISSM REALTY CORP., respondent, v. BROOKLYN COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT, LLC, appellant, et al., defendant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
129 A.D.3d 781
13 N.Y.S.3d 437
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 04813
KISSM REALTY CORP., respondent
v.
BROOKLYN COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT, LLC, appellant, et al., defendant.
2013-03999, 2013-09441
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
June 10, 2015.
Kinzler Law Group, PLLC, New York, N.Y. (Ben Kinzler of counsel), for appellant.
Woods & Lonergan LLP, New York, N.Y. (Lawrence R. Lonergan of counsel), for respondent.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., RUTH C. BALKIN, SANDRA L. SGROI, and COLLEEN D. DUFFY, JJ.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant Brooklyn Community Management, LLC, appeals from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court,
Kings County (Allman, Ct.Atty.Ref.), dated March 13, 2013, which, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the plaintiff and against it in the principal sum of $111,796.15, and (2) a money judgment of the same court dated September 3, 2013, which is in favor of the plaintiff and against it in the principal sum of $100,353.00.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,
ORDERED that the money judgment is affirmed; and it is further,
ORDERED that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiff.
The record is inadequate to enable this Court to review the issues raised by the defendant Brooklyn Community Management, LLC (hereinafter the LLC), with respect to an order of the Supreme Court dated July 13, 2011, which granted the plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint, as none of the motion papers which resulted in that order are contained therein (see Matter of Lynch, 98 A.D.3d 510, 511, 949 N.Y.S.2d 454 ; Block 6222 Constr. Corp. v. Sobhani, 84 A.D.3d 1292, 923 N.Y.S.2d 900 ; Wen Zong Yu v. Hua Fan, 65 A.D.3d 1335, 885 N.Y.S.2d 605 ). In addition, this Court cannot review...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Douglas
...fourth counterclaim, raised for the first time on appeal, are not properly before this Court (see KISSM Realty Corp. v. Brooklyn Community Mgt., LLC, 129 A.D.3d 781, 783, 13 N.Y.S.3d 437 ).The defendants' remaining contentions are without merit.Accordingly, we agree with the Supreme Court's......
-
JP Morgan Chase Bank, Nat'l Ass'n v. Butler
...Mtge. Co., LLC v. Mentesana, 79 A.D.3d 1079, 1080, 915 N.Y.S.2d 591 ). In opposition, Butler failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see 129 A.D.3d 781Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Islar, 122 A.D.3d at 567, 996 N.Y.S.2d 130 ; Katz v. Miller, 120 A.D.3d at 769, 991 N.Y.S.2d 346 ; KeyBank......
-
Dreisinger v. Teglasi
...A.D.3d 529asserts that he was not required to provide plans to defendants, he was at least required to demonstrate that he needed their 13 N.Y.S.3d 437consent in order to proceed with the construction. This he has failed to do. As such, there is no issue of fact requiring trial and defendan......
-
Tzifil Realty Corp. v. Mazrekaj
...inadequate to enable this Court to review" petitioner's recusal arguments on appeal (KISSM Realty Corp. v Brooklyn Community Mgt., LLC, 129 A.D.3d 781, 782 [2015]), as the underlying motion papers seeking recusal were not contained in the reproduced record. Contrary to petitioner's argument......