Klahr v. Goddard
| Decision Date | 14 March 1966 |
| Docket Number | Civ. No. 5112 Phoenix. |
| Citation | 254 F. Supp. 997 |
| Parties | Gary P. KLAHR, Plaintiff, v. Samuel P. GODDARD, Governor of the State of Arizona, and Wesley Bolin, Secretary of State of the State of Arizona, Defendants. |
| Court | U.S. District Court — District of Arizona |
Before POPE, Circuit Judge, and MATHES and WALSH, District Judges.
The Court having entered its decree herein on February 2, 1966, wherein it provided, inter alia, that Maricopa County and Pima County would be divided into temporary and provisional legislative subdistricts, the same to be as nearly equal in population as possible and composed of contiguous areas, and that the parties should file with the Clerk of this Court their proposals for so subdividing said Counties, and the parties having now stipulated a proposed plan for subdividing Maricopa County into legislative subdistricts, and each of the parties having separately submitted to the Court a proposed plan for subdividing Pima County into legislative subdistricts, and the Court having considered such plans and being fully advised in the premises, and good cause appearing therefor,
It is ordered, adjudged and decreed as follows:
That Maricopa County shall be divided into fifteen legislative subdistricts, designated 8-A to 8-O, inclusive, each legislative subdistrict to be composed of the Maricopa County election precincts hereinafter specified:
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Navajo Nation v. Arizona Independent Redistricting, CV 02-0799-PHX-ROS.
...See, e.g., Klahr v. Goddard, 250 F.Supp. 537 (D.Ariz.) (Congressional and legislative redistricting post-1960 census), amended by 254 F.Supp. 997 (D.Ariz.), amended by, 289 F.Supp. 827 (D.Ariz.1966); Klahr, 339 F.Supp. at 923-24 (Congressional and legislative redistricting post-1970 census)......
-
Rodriguez v. San Antonio Independent School District, Civ. A. No. 68-175-SA.
...506 (1964); Gunn v. University Committee to End War in Viet Nam, 399 U.S. 383, 90 S.Ct. 2013, 26 L.Ed.2d 684 (1970); and Klahr v. Goddard, 254 F.Supp. 997 (D.Ariz. 1966). Needless to say, we hope that no further action by this Court will be 1 See Serrano v. Priest, 5 Cal.3d 584, 96 Cal.Rptr......
-
Ely v. Klahr
...537. Thereupon the District Court drew a 'temporary and provisional' plan for the general elections of 1966 and 1968. See Klahr v. Goddard, 254 F.Supp. 997, 289 F.Supp. 827; Klahr v. Williams, 303 F.Supp. 224. In 1967 the legislature produced another plan which was approved by the voters an......
-
Klahr v. Williams, Civ. 5112 Phoenix.
...the Legislature itself adopted different and valid plans for districting and reapportionment. Klahr v. Goddard, Ariz., 250 F.Supp. 537; 254 F.Supp. 997. In June, 1967, the Arizona Legislature chosen at the first elections held in conformity with this court's decree enacted legislation appor......