Kleinberg v. Schwartz, A--23
| Citation | 214 A.2d 313,46 N.J. 2 |
| Decision Date | 08 November 1965 |
| Docket Number | No. A--23,A--23 |
| Parties | Paul R. KLEINBERG, etc., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Arthur SCHWARTZ et al., Defendants, and Charles Schwartz, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
On appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at 87 N.J.Super. 216, 208 A.2d 803.
Howard T. Rosen, Newark, for appellant (Clapp & Eisenberg, Newark, attorneys; Jerome C. Eisenberg and Arnold K. Mytelka, Newark, on the brief).
Jack L. Cohen, Newark, for respondent.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Kilkenny in the Appellate Division.
For affirmance: Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN--7.
For reversal: None.
To continue reading
Request your trial
7 cases
-
In re Stern-Slegman-Prins Co.
... ... For example, in Kleinberg v. Schwartz, 87 N.J.Super. 216, 208 A.2d 803 (App.Div.), aff'd on opinion below, 46 N.J. 2, 214 ... ...
-
Board of Educ. of Town of Boonton, Matter of
... ... See Kleinberg v. Schwartz, 87 N.J.Super. 216, 226, 208 A.2d 803 (App.Div.1965), aff'd, 46 N.J. 2, 214 A.2d 313 ... ...
-
Cavanagh v. Morris County Democratic Committee
...statute, which is regulatory in nature.' Kleinberg v. Schwartz, 87 N.J.Super. 216, 222, 208 A.2d 803, 807 (App.Div.1965), aff'd 46 N.J. 2, 214 A.2d 313 (1965). In the present case the aim of the statute is to prevent interference by the county committee with the candidacies of persons runni......
-
Historic Smithville Development Co. v. Chelsea Title & Guar. Co.
...N.J.Super. 40, 47, 182 A.2d 149 (App.Div.1962); Kleinberg v. Schwartz, 87 N.J.Super. 216, 222, 208 A.2d 803 (App.Div.1965), aff'd 46 N.J. 2, 214 A.2d 313 (1965). It claims that the Development Company is in truth a purchaser, a new owner of the property, and one never intended to be The arg......
Request a trial to view additional results