Klenosky v. New York City Police Dept.
| Decision Date | 29 May 1980 |
| Citation | 428 N.Y.S.2d 256,75 A.D.2d 793 |
| Parties | In re Rudolph M. KLENOSKY, Petitioner-Respondent, v. The NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al., etc., Respondents-Appellants. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Rudolph M. Klenosky, pro se.
J. E. Handler, New York City, for respondents-appellants.
Before FEIN, J. P., and SULLIVAN, LUPIANO, BLOOM and CARRO, JJ.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered July 25, 1979, which granted petition and directed respondents to issue a pistol carrying permit to petitioner, unanimously reversed, on the law, the application denied and the petition dismissed, without costs and disbursements.
On this record it is clear that the administrative determination denying petitioner's application for a pistol carrying permit (as distinct from an on-premises license) on the basis of failure to demonstrate "proper cause . . . for the issuance thereof" is supported by substantial evidence and is not arbitrary or capricious. Petitioner, a fifty-two year old attorney engaged in matrimonial and criminal law practice, did not sufficiently demonstrate a special need for...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Kachalsky v. Cacace
...Bratton, 238 A.D.2d 269, 656 N.Y.S.2d 626, 627 (1st Dep't 1997) (internal quotation marks omitted); Klenosky v. N.Y. City Police Dep't, 75 A.D.2d 793, 428 N.Y.S.2d 256, 257 (1st Dep't 1980), aff'd, 53 N.Y.2d 685, 439 N.Y.S.2d 108, 421 N.E.2d 503 (1981); see Bach v. Pataki, 408 F.3d 75, 80 (......
-
Bach v. Pataki
...profession." Williams v. Bratton, 238 A.D.2d 269, 270, 656 N.Y.S.2d 626 (1st Dep't 1997) (quoting Klenosky v. New York City Police Dep't, 75 A.D.2d 793, 428 N.Y.S.2d 256 (1st Dep't 1980), aff'd 53 N.Y.2d 685, 439 N.Y.S.2d 108, 421 N.E.2d 503 (1981)); see also Bando, 290 A.D.2d at 693, 735 N......
-
Davis v. Grimes
...from that of the general community or of persons engaged in the same profession.” Id. (quoting Klenosky v. New York City Police Dep't, 75 A.D.2d 793, 428 N.Y.S.2d 256, 257 (1980), aff'd on op. below, 53 N.Y.2d 685, 439 N.Y.S.2d 108, 421 N.E.2d 503 (1981) ). Licensing officers are local judg......
-
Kachalsky v. Cnty. of Westchester
...distinguishable from that of the general community or of persons engaged in the same profession.” Klenosky v. N.Y City Police Dep't, 75 A.D.2d 793, 793, 428 N.Y.S.2d 256 (1st Dep't 1980), aff'd on op. below,53 N.Y.2d 685, 439 N.Y.S.2d 108, 421 N.E.2d 503 (1981). There is a substantial body ......
-
Employer Considerations For Navigating Evolving Gun Laws
...federal law. Further Littler insights on this topic can be found here and here. Footnotes 1 E.g., In re Klenosky, 75 App. Div. 2d 793, 428 N. Y. S. 2d 256, 2 For example, the Town of Superior in Colorado had adopted a ban on certain categories of firearms, including assault weapons or large......
-
"THE TIMOROUS MAY STAY AT HOME": JUDGE CARDOZO'S PROPHECY IN CONTEMPORARY UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE.
...Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. Bruen. 142 S. Ct. 2111 (2022). (263) See id. at 2122. (264) See id. at 2122-23 (quoting In re Klenosky. 428 N.Y.S.2d 256, 257 (App. Div. (265) See Bruen, 142 S. Ct. at 2123 (citing O'Brien v. Keegan, 663 N.E.2d 316, 316-17 (NY. 1996); Babernitz v. Police Dep't of......
-
THE TERRITORIES UNDER TEXT, HISTORY, AND TRADITION.
...D.C.'s registration law ... does not satisfy [a] history- and tradition-based test...."). (30.) E.g., Klenosky v. N.Y.C. Police Dep't, 428 N.Y.S.2d 256, 257 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980), overruled in part by Bruen, 142 S. Ct. 2111 (construing the "proper cause" requirement to mean that a permit ap......