Klimek v. Town of Ghent, Columbia County
| Decision Date | 17 October 1985 |
| Citation | Klimek v. Town of Ghent, Columbia County, 494 N.Y.S.2d 453, 114 A.D.2d 614 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985) |
| Parties | Charles F. KLIMEK, Individually and as Father and Natural Guardian of Peter E. Klimek, an Infant, Respondent, v. TOWN OF GHENT, COLUMBIA COUNTY, New York, Appellant, and County of Columbia, New York, et al., Respondents. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Connor, Curran & Schram (Theodore Guterman, II, of counsel), Chatham, for appellant.
McClung, Peters, Simon & Arensburg (Susan F. Weber, of counsel), Albany, for respondent.
Maynard, O'Connor & Smith (Thomas G. Daley, of counsel), Albany, for respondents.
Donohue, Donohue & Sabo (Kenneth G. Varley, of counsel), Albany, for Catherine Burfeind and another, respondents.
Before KANE, J.P., and MAIN, WEISS, YESAWICH and LEVINE, JJ.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Cholakis, J.), entered November 29, 1984 in Columbia County, which denied defendant Town of Ghent's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it.
The facts in this case are set forth in Klimek v. Town of Ghent, 71 A.D.2d 359, 423 N.Y.S.2d 517, where we denied plaintiff's motion to dismiss the affirmative defense of lack of compliance with Local Law, 1976, No. 1 of Town of Ghent (requirement for prior written notice of condition complained of) and held the local law to be constitutional. The case is before us again on this appeal by defendant Town of Ghent from Special Term's denial of its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint because it had not received the written notice required by said Local Law No. 1. Briefly, plaintiff commenced this action against the Town and other defendants to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by his then infant son on July 19, 1978, when a tractor operated by the infant on a Town road allegedly ran on to the shoulder striking first a culvert, then a tree, and went down an embankment. The complaint alleges that the Town was negligent in designing, creating, constructing, establishing, repairing, reconstructing and maintaining the road, shoulder, drainage system and appurtenances thereto.
Plaintiff does not contend that he ever gave the prior written notice, but both he and the other defendants urge distinct grounds to support Special Term's denial of the Town's motion. The Town Superintendent of Highways testified at his deposition that no records of notices were kept by him or his predecessors prior to 1980, thus creating a factual issue as to whether any written notice was received. * Moreover, when a municipality has or should have knowledge of a defective or dangerous condition because it either has inspected or is performing work upon the subject area shortly before the accident, an exception to statutory prior written notice requirements may exist (see, Holt v. County of Tioga, 95 A.D.2d 934, 936, 464 N.Y.S.2d 278, appeal dismissed 60 N.Y.2d 701, 468 N.Y.S.2d 1028, 455 N.E.2d 1268; see also, Blake v. City of Albany, 63 A.D.2d 1075, 405 N.Y.S.2d 832, affd. 48 N.Y.2d 875, 424 N.Y.S.2d 358, 400 N.E.2d 300). Here, evidence obtained in pretrial disclosure created a triable issue of fact as to whether Town employees may have inspected the road shortly before the accident, thereby triggering the exception found in Blake v. City of Albany (supra ). Finally, plaintiff's opposing papers adequately presented a triable issue of fact as to whether the Town was guilty of negligence in constructing the culvert, an affirmative act of negligence for which it could be held liable even absent prior written notice (see, Haviland v. Smith, 91 A.D.2d 764, 458 N.Y.S.2d 11). Since the drastic remedy of...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Ferris v. County of Suffolk
...subject area shortly before the accident, an exception to statutory prior written notice requirements may exist" (Klimek v. Town of Ghent, 114 A.D.2d 614, 615, 494 N.Y.S.2d 453 [emphasis added]; see also, Kirschner v. Town of Woodstock, 146 A.D.2d 965, 967, 536 N.Y.S.2d 912; Holt v. County ......
-
Clute v. Town of Lisle
... ... City of New ... York, 8 N.Y.3d 888, 889 (2007); Chance v. County of ... Ulster, 144 A.D.3d 1257 (3rd Dept. 2016); see, ... Hubbard v ... Hempstead, 186 A.D.2d 627,628 ... (2nd Dept. 1992), quoting Klimek v. Town of ... Ghent, 114 A.D.2d 614, 615 (3rd Dept. 1985) ... (other ... ...
-
Farnsworth v. Village of Potsdam
...85 N.Y.2d 812, 631 N.Y.S.2d 288, 655 N.E.2d 401; Giganti v. Town of Hempstead, supra, at 628, 588 N.Y.S.2d 413; Klimek v. Town of Ghent, 114 A.D.2d 614, 615, 494 N.Y.S.2d 453), that exception is clearly inapplicable here, where the inspection occurred at least six and possibly seven years b......
-
Kirschner v. Town of Woodstock
...System, 35 N.Y.2d 629, 633-634, 364 N.Y.S.2d 823, 324 N.E.2d 312). Those few cases relied on by the dissent (e.g., Klimek v. Town of Ghent, 114 A.D.2d 614, 494 N.Y.S.2d 453) are, in our view, inapposite. These cases have excused compliance with the statutory written notice requirement only ......
-
Overruling by implication and the consequent burden upon bench and bar.
...v. City of Buffalo, 93 N.Y.2d 471, 715 N.E.2d 104, 693 N.Y.S.2d 77 (1999). (51) See, e.g., Klimek v. Town of Ghent, Columbia Cnty., 114 A.D.2d 614, 615, 494 N.Y.S.2d 453, 454 (App. Div. 3d Dep't 1985); Giganti v. Town of Hempstead, 186 A.D.2d 627, 628, 588 N.Y.S.2d 413, 414 (App. Div. 2d De......