Knetsch v. United States, 16356.
| Decision Date | 16 November 1959 |
| Docket Number | No. 16356.,16356. |
| Citation | 272 F.2d 200 |
| Parties | Karl F. KNETSCH and Eva Fay Knetsch, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
McLane & McLane, W. Lee McLane, Jr., Nola Lane, John Jay Schwartz, Thaddeus Rojek, Phoenix, Ariz., for appellants.
Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Grant W. Wiprud, Harry Baum, Lee A. Jackson, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., Laughlin E. Waters, U. S. Atty., Robert H. Wyshak, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before STEPHENS and HAMLIN, Circuit Judges, and LINDBERG, District Judge.
On December 11, 1953, the taxpayers purchased ten single premium annuity bonds from the Sam Houston Life Insurance Company. The purchase price of $4,004,000 was paid by a note for $4,000,000 and $4,000 in cash. The note was without recourse, and was secured by the annuity bonds. Interest on the note at three and one-half percent per annum, amounting to $140,000 was paid in cash. On December 16, $99,000 was sent to the taxpayers by Sam Houston as an additional loan, and the taxpayers paid the company $3,465 in interest. The bonds bore interest at the rate of two and one-half percent per annum, compounded annually. They matured in thirty years, and at that time would pay the taxpayers a monthly income of $43.00. Maturity could be accelerated or the bonds cashed in, at any time at the taxpayers' option. Mr. Knetsch was sixty when he made the purchase in 1953.
A similar transaction involving an interest payment of $147,105 was entered into for 1954, prior to March 1, when the provisions of the 1954 Internal Revenue Code affecting interest deductions for annuities went into effect. 26 U.S.C.A. § 264.
These interest payments to Sam Houston were claimed as deductions in the taxpayers' 1953 and 1954 tax returns. When the deductions were disallowed, the deficiencies were paid under protest, and suit was brought in the District Court for refund. The District Court found, with ample support in the record, that the annuity bonds provided neither profit nor insurance; that they had been purchased solely to obtain a tax benefit; and that the alleged interest was not interest in fact, but the purchase price of a tax deduction. From that adverse judgment, the taxpayers have appealed.
This case arises under the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, which allows interest1 as a deduction from gross income. The issue is whether such payments were...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Stanton v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, Docket No. 68914.
...cases and is not binding in this case although those cases and the Goodstein case were correctly decided on their own facts. Knetsch v. United States, 272 F.2d 200, certiorari granted 361 U.S. 958, decided by the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, involved a transaction in which the ta......
-
Rosenthal v. Commissioner
...conclusion here. See Max Barnett, supra, p. 281. It is recognized here, as was done in Knetsch v. United States, supra, affirming 272 F. 2d 200 (C. A. 9, 1959), that one of the principles stated in Gregory v. Helvering 35-1 USTC k 9043, 293 U. S. 465, is that a taxpayer has a right to decre......
-
Diggs v. CIR
...for deductibility similar to petitioner's contentions here were sustained by a divided court. More recently, in Knetsch v. United States, 9 Cir., 1959, 272 F.2d 200, certiorari granted 1960, 361 U.S. 958, 80 S.Ct. 589, 4 L.Ed.2d 541 the Ninth Circuit followed the Third Circuit in Weller, an......
-
Campbell v. Cen-Tex, Inc.
...action was generally required to plug those loopholes in the Federal revenue acts which permitted tax avoidance. Now, in no small measure, Knetsch5 is availed of by the Internal Revenue Service as a thumb-in-the-dike to thwart the use of tax escape devices. Karl F. Knetsch, in 1953 at the a......
-
Times Mirror - a reflection of the past.
...Gregory v. Helvering, the Supreme Court considered the application of the economic-substance doctrine in Knetsch, 364 US 361 (1960), aff'g 272 F2d 200 (9th Cir. 1959), a transaction involving the purchase of an annuity with mainly nonrecourse notes. It stated,"[f]or it is patent that there ......