Knight v. State

Decision Date05 May 1981
Citation399 So.2d 1143
PartiesKnight (Raymond) v. State NO. 60260
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

Appeal From: 3d DCA, 392 So.2d 337

Disposition: Pet. for rev. den.

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • Coley v. State
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • March 16, 1993
    ...... Codie v. State, 313 So.2d 754 (Fla.1975); Rodriguez v. State, supra; Matrascia v. State, 349 So.2d 735 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), cert. denied, 360 So.2d 1249 (Fla.1978). .         Knight v. State, 392 So.2d 337 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 399 So.2d 1143 (Fla.1981). . IV. . THE COLEY MAJORITY .         Here, the majority reweighs the evidence, disbelieves the prosecution evidence . Page 1028 . and finds that it would not have convicted. The majority misconstrues the ......
  • Jones v. State
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • February 26, 1985
    ......State, 305 So.2d 211 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), cert. denied, 315 So.2d 192 (Fla.1975), 2 Knight v. State, 392 So.2d 337 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), pet. for review denied, 399 So.2d 1143 (Fla.1981), 3 and Pressley v. State, 395 So.2d 1175 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), pet. for review denied, 407 So.2d 1105 (Fla.1981), 4 See State v. Navarro, 464 So.2d 137 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). Applying those principles to ......
  • Thomas v. State
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • September 17, 1987
    ......State, 454 So.2d 641 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); State v. Stewart, 404 So.2d 185 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Teague v. State, 390 So.2d 405 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Bouler v. State, 389 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Lowery v. State, 450 So.2d 587 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Knight v. State, 392 So.2d 337 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), rev. denied, 399 So.2d 1143 (Fla.1981). Page 1106.         The above attempt to formulate from case law principles of law 3 governing the granting or denying of judgments of acquittal in circumstantial evidence criminal cases are fully explored in ......
  • Dunn v. State
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • July 19, 1984
    ......State, 397 So.2d 1120 (Fla.1981), aff'd, 457 U.S. 31, 102 S.Ct. 2211, 72 L.Ed.2d 652 (1982); 3 State v. Stewart, 404 So.2d 185 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Teague v. State, 390 So.2d 405 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Bouler v. State, 389 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Knight v. State, 392 So.2d 337 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), review denied, 399 So.2d 1143 (Fla.1981); Lowery v. State, 450 So.2d 587 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). .         The difference between the view represented by the line of cases cited by defendant (note 2, supra ) and the view represented by the line of ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT