Knight v. State
Decision Date | 31 January 2017 |
Docket Number | No. SC14–1775,No. SC15–1233,SC14–1775,SC15–1233 |
Parties | Richard KNIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. Richard Knight, Petitioner, v. Julie L. Jones, etc., Respondent. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Neal Andre Dupree, Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Southern Region, Todd Gerald Scher, Assistant Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Southern Region, and
Jessica Leigh Houston, Staff Attorney, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, for Appellant/Petitioner
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and Lisa–Marie Krause Lerner, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, Florida, for Appellee/Respondent
Richard Knight appeals an order of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit Court in and for Broward County denying his motion to vacate his sentence of death filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. Knight also petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), (9), Fla. Const. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the circuit court's denial of Knight's rule 3.851 motion and deny his petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
On April 26, 2006, a jury found Richard Knight guilty of two counts of first-degree murder for the deaths of Odessia Stephens and her four-year-old child, Hanessia Mullings. The jury unanimously recommended a death sentence for each murder. Knight v. State, 76 So.3d 879, 884 (Fla. 2011).
On direct appeal, we set forth the following relevant factual and procedural background:
: fourteen in the neck, one on the chin, and the rest on her back and chest. Additionally, she had twenty-four puncture or scratch wounds and bruising and ligature marks on her neck. The bruises appeared to have been made by a belt or similar object. She also had defensive wounds on both hands and wounds on her leg, chest, back and neck. Several of the knife wounds were fatal but none would have resulted in an instantaneous death. She had bruises from being punched on her scalp and mouth. Davis opined that Knight began his attack in the bedroom with Odessia fleeing to the living room. He estimated that Odessia was conscious for ten to fifteen minutes after the attack.
Davis discovered Hanessia on the floor next to the closet door. There were broken knife pieces around her. She had a total of four stab wounds in her upper chest and neck. Her hand had one additional stab wound and numerous defensive wounds. Hanessia's arms and upper body had numerous bruises and scratches. There were bruises on her neck that were consistent with manual strangulation and bruises on her arms consistent with being grabbed.
Stephen Whitsett and Knight were housed together from June 29, 2000, to July 22, 2000, at the Broward County Jail. Knight confessed to Whitsett about the murders as follows: The night of the murders Knight and Odessia argued. She told him that she did not want to support him and that he would have to move. He asked for some more time because he had just gotten a job, but Odessia refused and told him to leave in the morning. Knight left the house to go for a walk and he became increasingly angry. He returned that night, confronted Odessia in her room, and they argued.
Knight went to the kitchen and got a knife. When he went back to the master bedroom, Odessia was on one side of the bed and Hanessia was on the other. He began by stabbing Odessia multiple times. Odessia eventually stopped defending herself and balled up into a fetal position. Knight then turned to four-year-old Hanessia. The knife broke while he was stabbing Hanessia, so he returned to the kitchen for another. Upon returning, Knight saw Hanessia had crawled to the closet door and was drowning in her own blood.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Reynolds v. State
...rejected similar Hurst claims where defendants received Standard Jury Instruction 7.11. Kaczmar , 228 So.3d at 9 ; Knight v. State , 225 So.3d 661, 682–83 (Fla. 2017) ; Davis , 207 So.3d at 174. Moreover, a review of Kaczmar , Knight , and Davis demonstrates that the critical instructions g......
-
Knight v. Fla. Dep't of Corr.
...to call an available DNA expert.The Florida Supreme Court rejected his postconviction claims on the merits. Knight v. State , 225 So. 3d 661, 668 (Fla. 2017) (per curiam). A plurality of the court agreed with Knight that the sentencing procedure used in his case violated the Sixth Amendment......
-
Fla. Fish & Wildlife Conservation Comm'n v. Daws
...any facts that could have supported his argument .... Accordingly, we conclude that this claim is insufficiently pled." Knight v. State , 225 So.3d 661, 675 (Fla. 2017).These cases illustrate that appellants cannot simply insert a legal phrase (here, "or takings") in an initial brief, make ......
-
Allen v. State, SC17-1623
...have held that the HAC aggravator is among the most weighty and serious aggravating factor in the sentencing scheme. See Knight v. State , 225 So.3d 661, 683 (Fla. 2017). Moreover, as the trial court noted, the disturbing facts of this case further support the conclusion that the Hurst erro......