Knowles v. Iowa

Decision Date08 December 1998
Docket Number977597
Citation119 S.Ct. 484,525 U.S. 113
PartiesPATRICK KNOWLES, PETITIONER v. IOWA
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

COUNSEL: Paul Rosenberg argued the cause for petitioner.

Bridget A. Chambers argued the cause for respondent.

JUDGES: REHNQUIST, C. J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.

OPINION BY: REHNQUIST

OPINION

CHIEF JUSTICE REHNQUIST delivered the opinion of the Court.

An Iowa police officer stopped petitioner Knowles for speeding, but issued him a citation rather than arresting him. The question presented is whether such a procedure authorizes the officer, consistently with the Fourth Amendment, to conduct a full search of the car. We answer this question "no."

Knowles was stopped in Newton, Iowa, after having been clocked driving 43 miles per hour on a road where the speed limit was 25 miles per hour. The police officer issued a citation to Knowles, although under Iowa law he might have arrested him. The officer then conducted a full search of the car, and under the driver's seat he found a bag of marijuana and a "pot pipe." Knowles was then arrested and charged with violation of state laws dealing with controlled substances.

Before trial, Knowles moved to suppress the evidence so obtained. He argued that the search could not be sustained under the "search incident to arrest" exception recognized in United States v. Robinson, 414 U.S. 218, 38 L. Ed. 2d 427, 94 S. Ct. 467 (1973), because he had not been placed under arrest. At the hearing on the motion to suppress, the police officer conceded that he had neither Knowles' consent nor probable cause to conduct the search. He relied on Iowa law dealing with such searches.

Iowa Code Ann. § 321.485(1)(a) (West 1997) provides that Iowa peace officers having cause to believe that a person has violated any traffic or motor vehicle equipment law may arrest the person and immediately take the person before a magistrate. Iowa law also authorizes the far more usual practice of issuing a citation in lieu of arrest or in lieu of continued custody after an initial arrest. 1 See Iowa Code Ann. § 805.1(1) (West Supp. 1997). Section 805.1(4) provides that the issuance of a citation in lieu of an arrest "does not affect the officer's authority to conduct an otherwise lawful search." The Iowa Supreme Court has interpreted this provision as providing authority to officers to conduct a full-blown search of an automobile and driver in those cases where police elect not to make a custodial arrest and instead issue a citation -- that is, a search incident to citation. See State v. Meyer, 543 N.W.2d 876, 879 (1996); State v. Becker, 458 N.W.2d 604, 607 (1990).

Based on this authority, the trial court denied the motion to suppress and found Knowles guilty. The Supreme Court of Iowa, sitting en banc, affirmed by a divided vote. 569 N.W.2d 601 (1997). Relying on its earlier opinion in State v. Doran, 563 N.W.2d 620 (1997), the Iowa Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the search under a bright-line "search incident to citation" exception to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement, reasoning that so long as the arresting officer had probable cause to make a custodial arrest, there need not in fact have been a custodial arrest. We granted certiorari, 523 U.S. 1003 (1998), and we now reverse.

The State contends that Knowles has challenged Iowa Code's § 805.1(4) only "on its face" and not "as applied," in which case, the argument continues, his challenge would run afoul of Sibron v. New York, 392 U.S. 40, 20 L. Ed. 2d 917, 88 S. Ct. 1889 (1968).But in his motion to suppress, Knowles argued that "because the officer had no probable cause and no search warrant, and the search cannot otherwise be justified under the Fourth Amendment, the search of the car was unconstitutional." App. 7. Knowles did not argue below, and does not argue here, that the statute could never be lawfully applied. The question we therefore address is whether the search at issue, authorized as it was by state law, nonetheless violates the Fourth Amendment. 2

In Robinson, supra, we noted the two historical rationales for the "search incident to arrest" exception: (1) the need to disarm the suspect in order to take him into custody, and (2) the need to preserve evidence for later use at trial. 414 U.S. at 234. See also United States v. Edwards, 415 U.S. 800, 802-803, 39 L. Ed. 2d 771, 94 S. Ct. 1234 (1974);Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752, 762-763, 23 L. Ed. 2d 685, 89 S. Ct. 2034 (1969);Preston v. United States, 376 U.S. 364, 367, 11 L. Ed. 2d 777, 84 S. Ct. 881 (1964); Agnello v. United States, 269 U.S. 20, 30, 70 L. Ed. 145, 46 S. Ct. 4 (1925);Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383, 392, 58 L. Ed. 652, 34 S. Ct. 341 (1914). But neither of these underlying rationales for the search incident to arrest exception is sufficient to justify the search in the present case.

We have recognized that the first rationale -- officer safety -- is "'both legitimate and weighty,'" Maryland v. Wilson, 519 U.S. 408, 412, 137 L. Ed. 2d 41, 117 S. Ct. 882 (1997) (quoting Pennsylvania v. Mimms, 434 U.S. 106, 110, 54 L. Ed. 2d 331, 98 S. Ct. 330 (1977) (per curiam)). The threat to officer safety from issuing a traffic citation, however, is a good deal less than in the case of a custodial arrest. In Robinson, we stated that a custodial arrest involves "danger to an officer" because of "the extended exposure which follows the taking of a suspect into custody and transporting him to the police station." 414 U.S. at 234-235. We recognized that "the danger to the police officer flows from the fact of the arrest, and its attendant proximity, stress, and uncertainty, and not from the grounds for arrest." 414 U.S. at 234, n. 5. A routine traffic stop, on the other hand, is a relatively brief encounter and "is more analogous to a so-called 'Terry stop' . . . than to a formal arrest." Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420, 439, 82 L. Ed. 2d 317, 104 S. Ct. 3138 (1984). See also Cupp v. Murphy, 412 U.S. 291, 296, 36 L. Ed. 2d 900, 93 S. Ct. 2000 (1973) ("Where there is no formal arrest . . . a person might well be less hostile to the police and less likely to take conspicuous, immediate steps to destroy incriminating evidence").

This is not to say that the concern for officer safety is absent in the case of a routine traffic stop. It plainly is not. See Mimms, supra, at 110;Wilson, supra, at 413- 414. But while the concern for officer safety in this context may justify the "minimal" additional intrusion of ordering a driver and passengers out of the car, it does not by itself justify the often considerably greater intrusion attending a full field-type search. Even without the search authority Iowa urges, officers have other, independent bases to search for weapons and protect themselves from danger. For example, they may order out of a vehicle both the driver, Mimms, supra, at 111, and any passengers, Wilson, supra, at 414; perform a "patdown" of a driver and any passengers upon reasonable suspicion that they may be armed and dangerous, Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 20 L. Ed. 2d 889, 88 S. Ct. 1868 (1968); conduct a "Terry patdown" of the passenger compartment of a vehicle upon reasonable suspicion that an occupant is dangerous and may gain immediate control of a weapon, Michigan v. Long, 463 U.S. 1032, 1049, 77 L. Ed. 2d 1201, 103 S. Ct. 3469 (1983); and even conduct a full search of the passenger compartment, including any containers therein, pursuant to a custodial arrest, New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454, 460, 69 L. Ed. 2d...

To continue reading

Request your trial
815 cases
  • In re Arturo D.
    • United States
    • California Supreme Court
    • 24 Enero 2002
    ...( Class, supra, 475 U.S. 106, 106 S.Ct. 960 ), and the other issued several years after Webster (Knowles v. Iowa (1998) 525 U.S. 113, 119 S.Ct. 484, 142 L.Ed.2d 492 (Knowles)). The Attorney General asserts that the first case, Class , supports Webster and the propriety of the searches ......
  • State v. Parker
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • 4 Noviembre 1999
    ...for driving with license suspended, there is simply no evidence of the crime to be hidden or lost. Cf. Knowles v. Iowa, 525 U.S. 113, 119 S.Ct. 484, 488, 142 L.Ed.2d 492 (1998) (The need to discover and preserve evidence is not present where defendant was stopped for speeding. "No further e......
  • M.D. ex rel. Daniels v. Smith
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Alabama
    • 27 Agosto 2007
    ...467, 38 L.Ed.2d 427 (1973). However, the exception applies only if an officer makes a custodial arrest. Knowles v. Iowa, 525 U.S. 113, 117, 119 S.Ct. 484, 142 L.Ed.2d 492 (1998); see also Robinson, 414 U.S. at 234-35, 94 S.Ct. 467 ("[T]he danger to an officer is far greater in the case of t......
  • State v. Askerooth, No. C6-02-318.
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • 17 Junio 2004
    ...when determining the validity of a pat-down search after a driver has been ordered out of a vehicle); cf. Knowles v. Iowa, 525 U.S. 113, 117, 119 S.Ct. 484, 142 L.Ed.2d 492 (1998) (stating that a general concern for officer safety during a traffic stop does not by itself justify the intrusi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
60 books & journal articles
  • The Supreme Court giveth and the Supreme Court taketh away: the century of Fourth Amendment "search and seizure" doctrine.
    • United States
    • Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Vol. 100 No. 3, June 2010
    • 22 Junio 2010
    ...out of the car during a traffic stop. (481) 526 U.S. 295 (1999). (482) See supra note 365 and accompanying text. (483) Knowles v. Iowa, 525 U.S. 113 (484) 532 U.S. 318 (2001). (485) See generally Davies, Arrest, supra note 16. (486) Atwater, 532 U.S. at 351-52. (487) Id. at 353. (488) 540 U......
  • Probable cause and reasonable suspicion: arrests, seizures, stops and frisks
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Suppressing Criminal Evidence - 2020 Contents
    • 31 Julio 2020
    ...2005). When police choose to issue a ticket instead of making an arrest, they cannot search a person incident to arrest. Knowles v. Iowa , 525 U.S. 113 (1998). §5:18 Sample Fact Scenario A security guard requests assistance from police to eject a rowdy patron from a tavern. They kick him ou......
  • Table of cases
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Texas Criminal Forms. Volume II - 2014 Contents
    • 12 Agosto 2014
    ...306 S.W.3d 738 (Tex.Cr.App. 2010), §15:147 Kizart v. State , 811 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1991, no pet .), Form 12-24 Knowles v. Iowa , 525 U.S. 113, 119 S.Ct. 484, 142 L.Ed.2d 492 (1998), §3:25 Kuhlmann v. Wilson , 477 U.S. 436, 106 S.Ct. 2616, 91 L.Ed.2d 364 (1986), §6:40, Form 4-17 Ku......
  • Search and Seizure: Property
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Texas Criminal Lawyer's Handbook. Volume 1 - 2018 Contents
    • 17 Agosto 2018
    ...issues a citation rather than making a full custodial arrest, he is not permitted to make a full search of the vehicle. Knowles v. Iowa, 525 U.S. 113, 119 S.Ct. 484, 142 L.Ed.2d 492 (1998). Where police have probable cause to believe that a vehicle contains contraband, they may search the e......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT