Koch v. Borough of Seaside Heights
| Decision Date | 01 October 1956 |
| Docket Number | No. A--16,A--16 |
| Parties | Edward S. KOCH, Plaintiff-Respondent v. BOROUGH OF SEASIDE HEIGHTS, a municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
On appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at 40 N.J.Super. 86, 122 A.2d 250.
Vincent A. Grasso, Toms River, argued the cause for appellant (Hiering & Grasso, Toms River, attorneys).
No appearance for respondent.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Conford in the court below.
For affirmance: Justices HEHER, WACHENFELD, BURLING, JACOBS and BRENNAN--5.
For reversal: Justice OLIPHANT--1.
No appearance for respondent.
To continue reading
Request your trial
17 cases
-
Kozesnik v. Montgomery Tp.
...332, 35 A.L.R.2d 1125 (1953); Koch v. Borough of Seaside Heights, 40 N.J.Super. 86, 93, 122 A.2d 250 (App.Div.1956), affirmed 22 N.J. 218, 125 A.2d 402 (1956); Haines v. Burlington County Bridge Commission, 1 N.J.Super. 163, 171, 63 A.2d 284 (App.Div.1949). The community-at-large has an int......
-
Al Walker, Inc. v. Borough of Stanhope
...64 A.2d 453, 456 (App.Div.1949); Koch v. Borough of Seaside Heights, 40 N.J.Super. 86, 93, 122 A.2d 250 (App.Div.1956), affirmed 22 N.J. 218, 125 A.2d 402 (1956). In the Haines case the court sustained a taxpayer's proceeding against county officials without any showing of private pecuniary......
-
Switz v. Middletown Tp., Monmouth County
...332, 35 A.L.R.2d 1125 (1953); Koch v. Borough of Seaside Heights, 40 N.J.Super. 86, 93 ,122 A.2d 250 (App.Div.1956), affirmed 22 N.J. 218, 125 A.2d 402 (1956); Haines v. Burlington County Bridge Commission, 1 N.J.Super. 163, 171, 63 A.2d 284 If the county tax were separately levied by the c......
-
Bergen County v. Port of New York Authority
...was lawful and proper. See Koch v. Borough of Seaside Heights, 40 N.J.Super. 86, 93, 122 A.2d 250 (App.Div.1956), affirmed 22 N.J. 218, 125 A.2d 402 (1956); cf. Garrou v. Teaneck Tryon Co., 11 N.J. 294, 302, 94 A.2d 332, 35 A.L.R.2d 1125 (1953); Salomon v. Jersey City, 12 N.J. 379, 383, 97 ......
Request a trial to view additional results