Koch v. State Bd. of Tax Appeals
| Decision Date | 26 January 1938 |
| Docket Number | No. 74.,74. |
| Citation | 119 N.J.L. 432,197 A. 275 |
| Parties | Frank KOCH, Respondent, v. STATE BOARD OF TAX APPEALS et al., Appellants. |
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
Appeal from Supreme Court.
James A. Hamill, of Jersey City, for appellants. Peter Bentley, of Jersey City, for respondent.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court, reported in 118 N.J.L. 85, 191 A. 558.
For affirmance: The CHANCELLOR, Justices CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, and PERSKIE, and Judges HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, and RAFFERTY —11.
For reversal: None.
To continue reading
Request your trial
6 cases
-
N.Y. Bay R. Co. v. Kelly
...Water Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 129 N.J.L. 535, 30 A.2d 400; Koch v. Jersey City, 118 N.J.L. 85, 191 A. 558, affirmed 119 N.J.L. 432, 197 A. 275; Gannon v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 123 N.J.L. 450, 454, 9 A.2d 531; Cedar Grove v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 171 A. 546, 12 N.J.Mis......
-
Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. City of Newark
...483, 33 A.2d 821 (E. & A.1943); Koch v. Jersey City, 118 N.J.L. 85, 88, 191 A. 558 (Sup.Ct.1937), affirmed Koch v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 119 N.J.L. 432, 197 A. 275 (E. & A.1938). And where the factual situation and questions presented are the same, the prior holding of the court in a ......
-
City Of Newark v. Newark & Essex Bldg. Corp...
...consideration of the tax history of this case (Koch v. Jersey City, 118 N.J.L. 85, 88, 191 A. 558 affirmed [Koch v. State Board of Tax Appeals,] 119 N.J.L. 432, 197 A. 275), clearly indicates the weakness of the Borough's present appeal. From 1927 through 1936 the Borough assessed these lan......
-
Borough of Haworth v. State Bd. of Tax Appeals
...N.J.Misc. 313, 316. A consideration of the tax history of this case (Koch v. Jersey City, 118 N.J.L. 85, 88, 191 A. 558, affirmed 119 N.J.L. 432, 197 A. 275), clearly indicates the weakness of the Borough's present appeal. From 1927 through 1936 the Borough assessed these lands at $200,000.......
Request a trial to view additional results