Kohn v. State
| Decision Date | 16 September 2011 |
| Docket Number | No. 1D10–1773.,1D10–1773. |
| Citation | 69 So.3d 388 |
| Parties | Johnnie R. KOHN, Appellant,v.STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, and David P. Gauldin, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General and Samuel A. Perrone, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.CLARK, J.
Johnnie Kohn appeals his convictions of attempted sexual battery and false imprisonment by force. We affirm without comment the trial court's denials of mistrial and new trial pertaining to the State's comments during closing argument. We write only to discuss Appellant's argument that the trial court erroneously denied his pre-trial motion to suppress the evidence found in his residence by police officers who entered without a warrant. Because the totality of the circumstances gave the officers a reasonable basis to rely on the victim's apparent authority to consent to entry of the apartment, the convictions on appeal are affirmed.
At the suppression hearing, one of the law enforcement officers involved testified that he responded to a call from a home near Appellant's apartment and observed a woman standing outside that home on the porch wearing only a bathrobe. The caller and owner of the home explained to the officer that the woman showed up at the house with no clothing, banged on the door, claimed that she had been raped and begged the homeowner to call the police. The homeowner made the call and provided the woman with the robe. The officer then spoke to the woman, who described how she came to be at that location without clothing, keys, or any personal effects. She told the officer that she was residing at Appellant's apartment at his invitation, that she had a key to the apartment, and that her name had been added to the lease. After an evening of using intoxicants with Appellant and others, the woman and Appellant were left alone in the apartment. Appellant then physically attacked the woman, threatened to shoot her if she left the apartment, and “ripped her dress completely off from the center down and that's how she ended up nude.” Appellant then reclined on the bed in the apartment with no clothing and an ashtray in his lap, and the woman sat next to him “until he passed out.” She then fled the apartment, leaving all her belongings, including her clothing.
Based on this information, the officer transported the woman back to Appellant's apartment. The officer testified that the woman assured him that she lived there and that she consented to the officer's entry into the residence. The woman remained in the vehicle while the officer approached the open door of the apartment. From the doorway, the officer could see the interior of the apartment, including into the bedroom, where he observed Appellant lying naked on the bed with an ashtray in his lap, positioned exactly as the woman had described he would be. After calling out to Appellant and getting no response, the officer entered the apartment and found a dress where the woman said it would be located, “ripped down the center” just as she had described. The woman eventually entered the apartment as well, dressed herself, and retrieved her purse. Appellant and the woman were transported to the Sheriff's office to speak with an investigator. The officer testified that he never saw or heard anything which made him doubt the woman's authority to enter the apartment or consent to his entry into the apartment.
While the Fourth Amendment usually prohibits law enforcement officers from entering an individual's home without a warrant, “a search conducted pursuant to a valid consent is constitutionally permissible.” Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 222, 93 S.Ct. 2041, 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973). “[W]hen the prosecution seeks to justify a warrantless search by proof of voluntary consent, it ... may show that...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Hernandez v. State
...and was not in actual possession of key when police found her in traumatized state just outside apartment); see also Kohn v. State, 69 So.3d 388 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011); United States v. McGee, 564 F.3d 136 (2d Cir.2009). Although Ms. Romero had apparent authority to consent to entry into Herna......
-
Walker v. State
...day; the officers "did not know who she was or what relationship she had to [the defendant] or to the residence"); cf. Kohn v. State, 69 So.3d 388, 390 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (holding that the trial court did not err in determining that officers had reasonably believed that the victim had had ......