Konop v. Hawaiian Airlines
| Decision Date | 28 August 2001 |
| Docket Number | No. 99-55106,DEFENDANT-APPELLEE,PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,99-55106 |
| Citation | 262 F.3d 972 |
| Parties | (9th Cir. 2001) ROBERT C. KONOP,, v. HAWAIIAN AIRLINES, INC., |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California D.C. No. CV-96-04898-SJL (JGx) J. Spencer Letts, District Judge, Presiding
Counsel Robert C. Konop, Pro se, Playa del Rey, California, plaintiff-appellant. Marianne Shipp, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Irvine, California, for the defendant-appellee.
Before: Robert Boochever, Stephen Reinhardt, and Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges.
OPINIONPasadena, California
Opinion by Judge Boochever
The opinion filed on January 8, 2001, published at Konop v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc., 236 F.3d 1035 (9th Cir. 2001), is withdrawn. As such, the petition for rehearing en banc filed by Hawaiian Airlines is moot. A subsequent opinion will be filed at a later date. Judge Reinhardt dissents from the withdrawal of the opinion.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Konop v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.
...(9th Cir.2001). Hawaiian filed a petition for rehearing, which became moot when we withdrew our previous opinion. Konop v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc., 262 F.3d 972 (9th Cir.2001). We now affirm the judgment of the district court with respect to Konop's Wiretap Act claims and his retaliation cl......
-
Konop v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.
...2. The previous opinion issued by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, dated January 8, 2001, was withdrawn. See Konop v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc., 262 F.3d 972 (9th Cir.2001). 3. The Bankruptcy Court stated that the $9,000 award should offset the sanctions amount that had been imposed on Kon......
-
Epstein v. Epstein
...F.3d 1035, 1044-46 (9th Cir.2001)—was later withdrawn and superseded by a decision adopting that requirement. See Konop v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc., 262 F.3d 972 (9th Cir. 2001) (withdrawing the just-cited decision); see also Konop, 302 F.3d at 878 ("We therefore hold that for a website such......