Korff v. Travelers Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn.
Decision Date | 17 April 1936 |
Docket Number | No. 5657.,5657. |
Citation | 83 F.2d 45 |
Parties | KORFF v. TRAVELERS INS. CO. OF HARTFORD, CONN. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit |
William R. Higgins, of Indianapolis, Ind., and Edwin C. Henning, of Evansville, Ind., for appellant.
Burke G. Slaymaker and Daniel H. Ortmeyer, of Evansville, Ind., for appellee.
Before EVANS and SPARKS, Circuit Judges, and LINDLEY, District Judge.
This case presents the problem of the liability of an insurer under a policy insuring against accidental death, where death results from the concurrence of an accident and a diseased condition, neither of which would have been sufficient to cause death but for the concurrence of the other. The court ruled on the question as a matter of law, directing a verdict in favor of the insurer, on the admission that "* * * the plaintiff does not contend that the accident, the fall alone, under the evidence in the case would have caused the death, if it had not been for the diseased condition of the body."
The policy in question, under which the decedent was insured, was a straight life policy with the following provision for additional indemnity in case of accidental death:
"* * * if death * * * shall result from bodily injuries effected directly and independently of all other causes through external, violent and accidental means within ninety days from the date of the accident which shall cause such injuries, and of which, except in case of drowning or internal injuries revealed by an autopsy, there is a visible contusion or wound on the exterior of the body, provided such death does not result * * * directly or indirectly from disease in any form, the Company will pay $5000 in addition to the amount of insurance payable in the event of the death of the Insured under the aforesaid contract."
The statement filed by the claimant with her proof of death showed the following facts as surrounding the death:
* * *"
Under these facts the court directed a verdict in favor of the insurer, holding that it was a case where general law applied rather than local law, and that the rule of general law excluded liability in such a case.
Appellant seeks to bring this case within the ruling laid down in Continental Casualty Co. v. Lloyd, 165 Ind. 52, 73 N.E. 824, 826. There decedent was insured under a policy which limited liability to "bodily injuries effected through external, violent, and purely accidental causes — such injuries as shall, solely and independently of all other causes, necessarily result in death within ninety days." Decedent suffered a very heavy fall, followed by death nineteen days later, said to have been caused by the fall. An autopsy disclosed the presence of a brain tumor, and there was testimony that but for the tumor the death would not have followed the fall. The court, however, held that the jury was justified in finding that the fall was the proximate cause of death, because it incited the fatal energy of the tumor which was at least dormant, and would have remained so for an indefinite period, and perhaps until death from some other cause supervened. While it appears in that case that the jury had some evidence before it to indicate that the fall was the sole cause of death, the decision does not rest on that, but holds that the policy limitation goes only to the proximate cause, so that if the diseased condition would not have caused death of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Evans v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.
... ... METROPOLITAN LIFE INS. CO. SAME v. TRAVELERS INS. CO. No. 29710. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. December 5, ... 254, 29 P.2d 1046; ... Kellner v. Travelers' Ins. Co. of Hartford, ... Conn., 180 Cal. 326, 181 P. 61; Bouchard v ... Commonwealth Casualty Co., 109 N.J.L ... 238, 160 A. 402; Korff v. Travelers' Ins. Co. of ... Hartford, Conn., 7 Cir., 83 F.2d 45 ... ...
-
Bankers Life Co. v. Nelson
... ... excepted from coverage of the policy. New York Life Ins ... Co. v. Ross, 30 F.2d 80; New York Life Ins. Co. v ... Shryock, 73 F ... 774; Phillips v. Travelers Ins. Co. (Mo.) 231 S.W ... 947; Association v. Supply ... Ins ... Co., 59 F.2d 544; Korff v. Ins. Co., 83 F.2d ... 45. Defendant objected to ... ...
-
New York Life Ins. Co. v. Schlatter
...995, 44 L.R.A.,N.S., 493; Benefit Association of Railway Employees v. Armbruster, 224 Ala. 302, 140 So. 356; Korff v. Travelers Insurance Co. of Hartford, Conn., 7 Cir., 83 F.2d 45." The case of Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. Askew, 194 Miss. 347, 11 So.2d 441, involve......
-
Railway Mail Ass'n v. Schrader
... ... In this ... connection see Sharpe v. Commercial Travelers' Mutual ... Accident Ass'n of America, 1894, 139 Ind. 92, ... 91, 152 ... S.W. 995, 44 L.R.A.,N.S., 493; Korff v. Travelers ... Insurance Co., 7 Cir., 1936, 83 F.2d 45; ... Standard Life ... & Accident Ins. Co., 1905, 95 Minn. 77, 103 N.W. 735, ... 884, 5 Ann.Cas ... ...