Kornegay v. State, 4 Div. 72.
| Decision Date | 01 February 1949 |
| Docket Number | 4 Div. 72. |
| Citation | 34 Ala.App. 274,38 So.2d 606 |
| Parties | KORNEGAY v. STATE. |
| Court | Alabama Court of Appeals |
J. Hubert Farmer, of Dothan, for appellant.
A. A. Carmichael, Atty. Gen., and Wm. N. McQueen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
The appellant was tried and convicted on an indictment charging carnal knowledge of a girl under twelve years of age.
We are urged to reverse the judgment of the court below despite the fact that the record presents no questions for our review. The proceedings in the circuit court were in every respect regular. The general affirmative charge in appellant's behalf was not tendered. A motion for a new trial was not filed. A few objections were interposed relating to the introduction of the evidence. In each instance, when the ruling was adverse to the accused, no exceptions were reserved. Kelley v. State, 32 Ala.App. 408, 26 So.2d 633.
Our review is limited to those matters upon which rulings at nisi prius proceedings were timely invoked. Lipscomb v. State, 32 Ala.App. 623, 29 So.2d 145. We do not hesitate to state, however, that, had the indicated questions been duly raised, we would still find it necessary to affirm the judgment below.
It is ordered that the judgment of the lower court be affirmed.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Ford v. City of Birmingham, 6 Div. 970
...counsel did not interpose any exceptions or in any manner complain about the matter at the time of the occurrence. Kornegay v. State, 34 Ala.App. 274, 38 So.2d 606; Lipscomb v. State, 32 Ala.App. 623, 29 So.2d 145. Refused charges numbered 3 and 4 are not predicated on the evidence, and are......
-
Nehi Bottling Co. of Boaz v. Templeton
... ... 266 NEHI BOTTLING CO. OF BOAZ v. TEMPLETON. 8 Div. 718.Alabama Court of AppealsFebruary 1, 1949 [38 So.2d 607] ... 153, 142 So. 586 ... In this ... state of the procedure another well recognized doctrine must ... be given ... 829; Louis Pizitz Dry ... Goods Co. v. Driesbach, 30 Ala.App. 159, 4 So.2d 180; ... United Wholesale Grocery Co. v. Minge Floral Co., 25 ... ...
-
Traffenstedt v. State, 7 Div. 970.
... ... instance was thereby obviated. Jennings v. State, 15 ... Ala.App. 116, 72 So. 690; Winn v. Cudahy Packing Co. of ... Ala., 241 Ala. 581, 4 So.2d 135 ... The ... appellant introduced a witness who related a part of a ... conversation he had with the sheriff after the ... ...
-
Commons v. State, 6 Div. 127
...by the appellate courts is limited to those matters on which rulings at nisi prius proceedings were timely invoked. Kornegay v. State, 34 Ala.App. 274, 38 So.2d 606; Parcus v. State, 19 Ala.App. 592, 99 So. The record discloses: 'During Asst. Solicitor McCall's closing argument he referred ......