Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United States | 1-929-605-4013

Kramer v. Kastleman

Document Justia Case Summary Cited authorities 69 Cited in 27 Precedent Map Related
Docket Number14-1038
Decision Date27 January 2017
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
31 cases
  • Lalonde v. Gosnell
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • June 14, 2019
    ...litigants from taking contradictory positions as a means of gaining an unfair advantage from the inconsistency." Kramer v. Kastleman , 508 S.W.3d 211, 217 (Tex. 2017). It "generally prevents one party from misleading another to the other's detriment or to the misleading party's own benefit.......
  • BPX Operating Co. v. Strickhausen
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • June 11, 2021
    ...in settlement negotiations with BPX throughout the disputed period.9 This is consistent with our recognition in Kramer v. Kastleman , 508 S.W.3d 211, 213 (Tex. 2017), that determining whether a litigant who voluntarily accepts the benefits of a judgment is precluded from challenging the jud......
  • In re Nash
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • March 4, 2022
    ...litigants from taking contradictory positions as a means of gaining an unfair advantage from the inconsistency." Kramer v. Kastleman , 508 S.W.3d 211, 217 (Tex. 2017) (quoting Matlow v. Cox , 25 Tex. 578, 580–81 (1860) ).[B]efore denying a merits-based resolution to a dispute, courts must e......
  • Guerra v. L&F Distribs., LLC
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • May 24, 2017
    ...litigants from taking contradictory positions as a means of gaining an unfair advantage from the inconsistency." Kramer v. Kastleman , 508 S.W.3d 211, 217 (Tex. 2017). However, "as long as an appellant ‘accepts only that which appellee concedes, or is bound to concede, to be due him under t......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Chapter 16-12 Estoppel
    • United States
    • Full Court Press Texas Commercial Causes of Action Claims Title Chapter 16 Affirmative Defenses*
    • Invalid date
    ...(Tex. 2009).[111] Moore v. Neff, 629 S.W.2d 827, 829 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1982, writ ref'd n.r.e.).[112] Kramer v. Kastleman, 508 S.W.3d 211, 218 (Tex. 2017) (citing Carle v. Carle, 234 S.W.2d 1002, 1002-5).[113] Kramer v. Kastleman, 508 S.W.3d 211, 228 (Tex. 2017).[114] Kramer v......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT