Kramer v. Petisi
| Decision Date | 03 November 2005 |
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
| Parties | Myra J. KRAMER et al. v. Robert J. PETISI et al. |
The named plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 91 Conn.App. 26, 879 A.2d 526 (2005), is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly apply the law of comparative negligence to the named plaintiff's claims of misrepresentation against the defendants?"
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17549.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 books & journal articles
-
Tort Developments in 2008
...285 Conn. 674, 681, 940 A.2d 800 (2008). The Appellate Court in Kramer v. Petisi, 91 Conn. App. 26, 879 A.2d 526, cert. granted in part, 276 Conn. 916, 888 A.2d 84 (2005), decided that comparative negligence was applicable to a negligent misrepresentation action. The plaintiff prior to the ......
-
Significant Tort Developments in 2005
...muddy fiberglass bleachers leaving him totally dis- 75 Id. 76 Id. 77 90 Conn. App. 781,782-83, 881 A. 2d 428, cert. denied, 276 Conn. 915, 888 A. 2d 84 (2005). 78 Id. 79 Id. at 783. 80 Id. at 785-87. 81 Id. at 787. 82 273 Conn. 759, 873 A. 2d 175 (2005). 83 Id. at 760-61. abled.(fn84) The p......