Kramer v. United States

Decision Date14 January 1918
Docket NumberNo. 680,680
Citation245 U.S. 478,62 L.Ed. 413,38 S.Ct. 168
PartiesKRAMER et al. v. UNITED STATES
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Mr. Harry Weinberger, of New York City, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Solicitor General Davis, of Washington, D. C., for the United States.

Mr. Chief Justice WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

In this case, as in No. 702, Goldman v. United States, 245 U. S. 474, 38 Sup. Ct. 166, 62 L. Ed. ——, just previously decided, because of constitutional questions, the case was brought here by direct writ of error, with the object of re- viewing and reversing a conviction and sentence under an indictment charging an unlawful conspiracy to induce persons whose duty it was to register under the Selective Draft Law (Act May 18, 191 , c. 15), not to perform that duty and alleging overt acts done for the purpose of carrying out the illegal conspiracy. The defenses were substantially the same as those urged in the previous case and the assignments of error made at the time of the allowance of the writs were identical. In fact at bar the propositions and arguments relied upon in the previous case were stated to be controlling in this. But, therefore, for the fact that there was different evidence in the two cases the considerations...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • In re Weitzman
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • April 7, 1970
    ...appear to have been made in Goldman v. United States, 245 U.S. 474, 38 S.Ct. 166, 62 L.Ed. 410 (1918); Kramer v. United States, 245 U.S. 478, 38 S.Ct. 168, 62 L.Ed. 413 (1918); Ruthenberg v. United States, 245 U.S. 480, 38 S.Ct. 168, 62 L.Ed. 414 (1918); Yanyar v. United States, 246 U.S. 64......
  • United States v. Richmond
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Central District of California
    • August 21, 1967
    ...them, and decided on January 14, 1918 were Goldman v. United States, 245 U.S. 474, 38 S.Ct. 166, 62 L. Ed. 410; Kramer v. United States, 245 U.S. 478, 38 S.Ct. 168, 62 L.Ed. 413; and Ruthenberg v. United States, 245 U.S. 480, 38 S.Ct. 168, 62 L.Ed. 414, in each of which a separate opinion w......
  • Cross v. United States, 18828.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • April 5, 1968
    ...v. United States, 317 U.S. 49, 63 S.Ct. 99, 87 L. Ed. 23; Troutman v. United States, 10 Cir., 100 F.2d 628; Kramer v. United States, 245 U.S. 478, 38 S.Ct. 168, 62 L.Ed. 413." As succinctly stated in United States v. Root, 366 F.2d 377, 383 (9 Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 912, 87 S.Ct......
  • United States v. Kinkead
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Jersey
    • March 4, 1918
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT