Krane v. Aetna Life Insurance Co., Civ. A. No. 87-C-1873.
Decision Date | 02 November 1988 |
Docket Number | Civ. A. No. 87-C-1873. |
Citation | 698 F. Supp. 220 |
Parties | Richard KRANE, Bryan Krane, Rhonda Krane and Maria Smith, Plaintiffs, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Colorado |
Scott R. Larson, Denver, Colo., for plaintiffs.
Cecelia Fleischner, Long & Jaudon, Denver, Colo., for defendant.
Plaintiffs commenced this action by filing a complaint for declaratory action in the state district court for the City and County of Denver, Colorado. Defendant Aetna Life Insurance Company ("Aetna") then filed a petition for removal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b). Diversity jurisdiction is alleged to exist under 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
The following facts appear undisputed: Plaintiffs are the children of Mr. Richard Krane, who died on May 28, 1982, during parathyroid surgery at St. Anthony Hospital in Denver, Colorado. Plaintiffs commenced a medical malpractice suit against St. Anthony and two doctors involved with the surgery. Subsequently, the plaintiffs settled their lawsuit with the physicians under an agreement in which the physicians did not confess liability. Plaintiffs also asserted claims under a life insurance policy issued by the defendant to Mr. Krane's employer, the General Foods Corporation. Defendant paid the requested benefits under the life insurance policy.
This action arises out of an additional insurance policy issued by the defendant to General Foods Corporation. This policy covered accidental death and dismemberment. Plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment that Aetna is obligated to pay benefits to them under this policy.
A brief review of the decedent's medical history would be helpful: Mr. Krane was admitted to St. Anthony for surgical exploration of the parathyroid gland. Mr. Krane's diagnosis was primary hyperparathyroidism. On May 22 and 24, 1982, Mr. Krane met with Dr. Wayne Moss to discuss his diagnosis and the risks and benefits of surgical treatment. On May 27, 1982, Krane voluntarily signed a consent form authorizing exploratory surgery of his neck to be performed by Dr. Moss at St. Anthony Hospital.
On May 28, 1982, Mr. Krane underwent exploratory surgery. Tragically, he died approximately two hours into the procedure. The official cause of death was cardiac arrest of unknown cause while under general anesthesia.
Article II, § 1 of the accidental death and dismemberment policy (policy no. ACC-45500) provides, in relevant part:
Article II, § 2 of the accidental death and dismemberment policy states, in pertinent part:
Article II, § 3 does not set forth exclusions to the policy. Rather, it discusses the designation of policy beneficiaries and their rights.
Currently pending are the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment. The parties assert that there are no genuine issues of material fact which would preclude the granting of summary judgment. The legal issues have been briefed and oral argument would not materially assist my decision.
Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c), summary judgment is proper "if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law." Celotex Corp v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986). In Catrett the Court held that Rule 56 mandates the entry of summary judgment, after adequate time for discovery and upon motion, against a party who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial. Id. at 322, 106 S.Ct. at 2552.
The issue presented by the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment is whether the accidental death and dismemberment insurance policy issued by the defendant can be construed to cover the death of the plaintiff's father.
"Ordinarily the construction of a contract is a question of law for the court." People v. Johnson, 618 P.2d 262, 266 (Colo.1980); see also GTM Investments v. Depot, Inc., 694 P.2d 379, 381-82 (Colo.App.1984). "Where the meaning of the agreement is clear on its face there is nothing to interpret it and it must be enforced as written." Johnson, at 266; Bennett v. Price, 692 P.2d 1138, 1139 (Colo.App.1984). Whether or not a contract is ambiguous is a question of law for the court. Id. Additionally, it is a well-established principle that an insuror cannot be held liable beyond the scope of risks which have been clearly covered in its...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hammer v. Lumberman's Mut. Cas. Co.
...applied similar reasoning. Pickard v. Transamerica Occidental Life Ins. Co., 663 F.Supp. 126 (E.D.Mich.1987); Krane v. Aetna Life Insurance Co., 698 F.Supp. 220 (D.Colo.1988); Castorena v. Colonial Life & Accident Ins. Co., 107 N.M. 460, 760 P.2d 152 (1988); see also Simmons v. Provident Mu......
-
Senkier v. Hartford Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 91-1683
...v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 440 F.Supp. 1182 (S.D.Ill.1977), aff'd without opinion, 588 F.2d 835 (7th Cir.1978), and Krane v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 698 F.Supp. 220 (D.Colo.1988); contra, Mayfield v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 585 S.W.2d 163, 168-69 (Mo.App.1979). The plaintiff argues that her d......
-
Miller v. Hartford Life Ins. Co.
...of an intravenous needle infected with bacteria was not an "accident" under an accidental death insurance policy); Krane v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 698 F.Supp. 220 (D.Colo.1988) (holding that an insured's death during exploratory surgery was a result of surgical treatment, not an accident); Re......
-
Swisher-Sherman v. Provident Life & Acc. Ins. Co.
...I.V. needle; although use of infected needle was an accident, it occurred as part of medical treatment); Krane v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 698 F.Supp. 220, 223 (D.Colo.1988) (accidental death and dismemberment policy's exclusion for "medical or surgical treatment" precluded coverage for death a......