Krasner v. City of N.Y.
Decision Date | 23 September 2013 |
Docket Number | 11 Civ. 2048 (PGG) |
Parties | GLENN KRASNER, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, and THE FIRE DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York |
Plaintiff Glenn Krasner alleges that Defendants the City of New York and the Fire Department of the City of New York ("FDNY") discriminated against him because he suffers from Asperger's syndrome, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., the New York State Human Rights Law ("NYSHRL"), Executive Law § 296 et seq., and the New York City Human Rights Law ("NYCHRL"), N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-107 et seq. The Complaint also alleges that Defendants retaliated against him after he filed a complaint with the FDNY Office of Equal Employment Opportunity and because he sought a reasonable accommodation.
Krasner moved for summary judgment on September 12, 2012, and Defendants cross-moved for summary judgment on September 24, 2012. For the reasons stated below, Krasner's motion will be denied and Defendants' motion will be granted.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On June 29, 1992, Krasner was provisionally appointed a Fire Protection Inspector ("FPI") with of the FDNY. (Def. R. 56.1 Stmt. ¶ 3)1 Plaintiff received a permanent appointment as an FPI on December 9, 1996, after passing the civil service examination. (Def. R. 56.1 Stmt. ¶¶ 2, 4) FPI's inspect premises and businesses to ensure that they are in compliance with FDNY codes and regulations. (Def. R. 56.1 Stmt. ¶ 5) Plaintiff received six weeks of training, during which he was instructed on the relevant codes and regulations, how to perform inspections, and how to properly complete required paperwork. (Def. R. 56.1 Stmt. ¶¶ 6-7) Plaintiff was assigned to work at District Office 1, located at 9 Metrotech Center, Brooklyn, New York - the same building that houses the FDNY executive offices. (Def. R. 56.1 Stmt. ¶ 12) In 2006, Plaintiff was honored as Fire Inspector of the Year by the FDNY. (Pltf. R. 56.1 Stmt. ¶ 10)
On April 4, 1997, Plaintiff was served with a disciplinary charge alleging that he had been disrespectful to a co-worker on January 2, 1997. (Def. R. 56.1 Stmt. ¶13) Plaintiff had said to a co-worker, "[c]an I fuck you in the ass?" (Def. R. 56.1 Stmt. ¶ 14) As a result of this incident, Plaintiff agreed to accept a formal letter of reprimand, in lieu of a formal evidentiaryhearing before an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) of the City's Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings ("OATH").2 (Def. R. 56.1 Stmt. ¶ 15)
In 2003, Plaintiff was again disciplined for using inappropriate language to a co-worker. (Def. R. 56.1 Stmt. ¶ 16) Plaintiff told a co-worker, "[s]uck my dick." (Def. R. 56.1 Stmt. ¶17) On May 5, 2003, Plaintiff signed a Stipulation and Agreement accepting a formal reprimand. (Def. R. 56.1 Stmt. ¶ 18)
On August 12, 2004, during a meeting of the District Office, Plaintiff was disorderly and disruptive. (Def. R. 56.1 Stmt. ¶ 19) According to Plaintiff, at this meeting he "screamed at the top of [his] voice with profanity and total disrespect so loud that it was almost deafening." (Def. R. 56.1 Stmt. ¶ 20) He was issued a disciplinary memorandum in connection with this incident. (Collyer Decl., Ex. I)
On February 14, 2006, Plaintiff was charged with violating the FDNY's Civilian Code of Conduct. (Def. R. 56.1 Stmt. ¶ 21) The charge alleged that Plaintiff (Def. R. 56.1 Stmt. ¶ 21; Collyer Decl., Ex. J at BITS0007-BITS0010)
On February 16, 2006, Plaintiff was again charged with violating the Code of Conduct. (Def. R. 56.1 Stmt. ¶ 21) The charging documents state: (Def. R. 56.1 Stmt. ¶ 21; Collyer Decl., Ex. J at BITS0011-BITS0013) (emphasis in original). The charging documents also state that on the same day, (Def. R. 56.1 Stmt. ¶21; Collyer Decl., Ex. J. at BITS0014-BITS0016) (emphasis in original).
On April 17, 2007, Cho Seung-Hui shot and killed 32 people and wounded others on the campus of Virgina Tech. One week later, on April 24, 2007, Plaintiff chanted "Metrotech equals Virginia Tech" to his colleagues at District Office 1 and referred to himself as "Cho," the shooter at Virginia Tech.3 Plaintiff's supervisor at the time, John Tuah, instructed him to stop his chanting, but Plaintiff refused. (Def. R. 56.1 Stmt. ¶ 24) Tuah then reported Krasner's behavior to his supervisor. Fire marshals responded to the floor and revoked Plaintiff's security credentials, requiring him to pass through metal detectors each morning. (Def. R. 56.1 Stmt. ¶ 26)
Following this incident, Plaintiff was ordered to seek treatment from the FDNY Counseling Services Unit. (Pltf. R. 56.1 Stmt. ¶ 16) Plaintiff saw FDNY counselor Michael Goldman and attended sessions with FDNY psychiatrist Dr. Sarah Gleacher. (Pltf. R. 56.1 Stmt. ¶ 17) There is no evidence that the FDNY Counseling Services Unit reported any aspect of Krasner's diagnosis and treatment to his supervisors. There is likewise no evidence that Krasnerengaged in additional acts of misconduct between April 24, 2007, and his termination on November 23, 2009.
On April 30, 2007, Plaintiff was informally served with twelve disciplinary charges alleging disorderly or disruptive conduct, and conduct prejudicial to the good order and discipline of the FDNY. The disciplinary charges relate to the February 14, 2006, February 16, 2006, and April 24, 2007 incidents discussed above. (Collyer Decl., Ex. J) Plaintiff acknowledged receipt of the charges on May 4, 2007. (Id.)
(Krasner Decl., Ex. A at 1, 4-5)
In her findings, the hearing officer states that she is (Krasner Decl., Ex. E at BITS0066) The FDNY's disciplinary counsel recommended a penalty consisting of the loss of ten days' pay, the loss of ten days of annual leave, and a 24-month probationary period. If Krasner committed similar misconduct, he would "be sanctioned with an automatic 30 day pay penalty." (Id. at BITS0067) The hearing officer states that she does "not oppose that recommendation." (Id.)
The FDNY sought Krasner's removal, however, and on June 25, 2009, Krasner was informed that a disciplinary proceeding would be conducted on July 21 and 22, 2009, before an Administrative Law Judge of New York City's Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings. (Krasner Decl., Ex. F)
A trial before ALJ Ingrid Addison took place on July 21 and 22, 20095 At the hearing, Plaintiff was represented by counsel, testified on his own behalf, was able to call and examine witnesses, cross-examine FDNYwitnesses, and offer documentary evidence. (Def. R. 56.1 Stmt. ¶ 29) In addition to Krasner, Judge Addison heard testimony from William Dease and John Tuah, deputy chief inspectors, both of whom supervised Krasner at District Office 1. (Collyer Decl., Ex. F, at 4-6)
Dease and Tuah testified to the February 14 and 16, 2006 incidents discussed above and Krasner's work performance in general. (Collyer...
To continue reading
Request your trial