Krause v. Watson Bros. Transp. Co., Inc., 15975.
Docket Nº | 15975. |
Citation | 119 Colo. 73, 200 P.2d 387 |
Case Date | November 29, 1948 |
Court | Supreme Court of Colorado |
200 P.2d 387
119 Colo. 73
KRAUSE et ux.
v.
WATSON BROS. TRANSP. CO., Inc., et al.
No. 15975.
Supreme Court of Colorado, en Banc.
November 29, 1948
Error to District Court, City and County of Denver; Robert W. Steele, Judge.
Action by Mr. and Mrs. Ralph Krause against Watson Brothers Transportation Company, Inc., a corporation, and James Floyd Lawson to recover for death of plaintiffs' daughter. To review an adverse judgment, the plaintiffs bring error.
Judgment reversed and case remanded.
Rogers, Bruno & Rogers, of Denver, for plaintiffs in error.
H. Berman, of Denver, for defendants in error.
[119 Colo. 74] STONE, Justice.
Plaintiffs in error sought to recover damages from defendants in error for asserted negligence of the latter in connection with the operation of a motor truck which resulted in the death of their six year old daughter, Loretta Krause, at the loading dock of defendant corporation. At the close of plaintiffs' case the court upon motion by defendants for dismissal, directed the jury to return a verdict finding the issues joined for the defendants, and rendered judgment in accord therewith. The question here involved is the sufficiency of the evidence to require submission of the case to the jury.
Plaintiffs offered evidence in brief as follows: Loretta, on the afternoon of the fatality, joined her brothers Ralph, aged nine, and Robert, aged seven, at play in a neighboring ball park, and from there the three children crossed the street to the warehouse and adjoining loading docks operated by the defendant corporation; they had been there many times Before to play, the last time being only a few days Before ; the dock floor was so constructed as to be level with the floor of the company trailers and about three feet from the ground; there were men at work on the dock nearby; Ralph climbed upon the dock and [200 P.2d 388] Robert climbed upon a trailer which was backed up to the dock and about three feet from it, and the two of them were attempting to lift Loretta upon the trailer when defendant Lawson, an employee of defendant corporation, who had been working on the docks, came out of the warehouse, crossed the dock to a company tractor which stood in front of the trailer, then drove the tractor forward until in proper line and backed it against the trailer, hitting it, as is customary, with sufficient force to engage the coupling pin; this resulted, as frequently happened, in [119 Colo. 75] driving the rear end of the trailer against the dock, where it crushed Loretta's body between them. There was further evidence that the dock and trucks were near and plainly visible from the street and in part unfenced, and that children played about the docks 'all the time.' Defendant Lawson testified that he did not notice any children playing around there as he went to hook up the trailer, but that he had seen children playing there; that he had never chased children away from there because it was none of his business, but that he had 'seen foremen up there chase them away continually.' Defendant Lawson's helper Greenfield, at the time of the accident, was standing on the east side of the trailer waiting to roll up the dollies on the trailer after the coupling was completed. Another witness testified that she lived directly across the street in an upstairs apartment; that...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Mile High Fence Co. v. Radovich, No. C--31
...v. Kroeger, 138 Colo. 55, 330 P.2d 958; Roessler v. O'Brien, 119 Colo. 222, 201 P.2d 901; Krause v. Watson Bros. Transportation Co., 119 Colo. 73, 200 P.2d 387; Averch v. Johnston, supra; Florence & Cripple Creek R.R. Co. v. Kerr, 59 Colo. 539, 151 P. 439; Catlett v. Colo. & Souther......
-
Bogart v. Hester, No. 6439
...Co., 192 N.C. 791, 136 S.E. 125; Yamauchi v. O'Neill, 38 Cal.App.2d 703, 102 Page 335 P.2d 365; Krause v. Watson Bros. Transp. Co., 119 Colo. 73, 200 P.2d 387; Schmidt v. Michigan Coal & Mining Co., 159 Mich. 308, 123 N.W. 1122; Warner v. Lieberman, 7 Cir., 253 F.2d 99; Petrol Corp. v. ......
-
Ward v. Forrester Day Care, Inc.
...while dealing with children upon the premises. Nettrour v. J.C. Penney Co., 146 Colo. 150, 360 P.2d 964 (1961); Krause v. Watson Bros., 119 Colo. 73, 200 P.2d 387 (1948). The event here was of the kind indicating negligence in the performance of an act which was within the scope of defendan......
-
Le Compte v. Wardell, No. 9790
...Cal.2d 133, 148 P.2d 19, 156 A.L.R. 1221; McGlone v. William Angus, Inc., 248 N.Y. 197, 161 N.E. 469; Krause v. Watson Bros. Transp. Co., 119 Colo. 73, 200 P.2d 387; Newman v. Fox West Coast Theatres, 86 Cal.App.2d 428, 194 P.2d 706, Annotation, 156 A.L.R. [134 Mont. 499] Likewise the part ......
-
Mile High Fence Co. v. Radovich, No. C--31
...v. Kroeger, 138 Colo. 55, 330 P.2d 958; Roessler v. O'Brien, 119 Colo. 222, 201 P.2d 901; Krause v. Watson Bros. Transportation Co., 119 Colo. 73, 200 P.2d 387; Averch v. Johnston, supra; Florence & Cripple Creek R.R. Co. v. Kerr, 59 Colo. 539, 151 P. 439; Catlett v. Colo. & Souther......
-
Bogart v. Hester, No. 6439
...Co., 192 N.C. 791, 136 S.E. 125; Yamauchi v. O'Neill, 38 Cal.App.2d 703, 102 Page 335 P.2d 365; Krause v. Watson Bros. Transp. Co., 119 Colo. 73, 200 P.2d 387; Schmidt v. Michigan Coal & Mining Co., 159 Mich. 308, 123 N.W. 1122; Warner v. Lieberman, 7 Cir., 253 F.2d 99; Petrol Corp. v. ......
-
Ward v. Forrester Day Care, Inc.
...while dealing with children upon the premises. Nettrour v. J.C. Penney Co., 146 Colo. 150, 360 P.2d 964 (1961); Krause v. Watson Bros., 119 Colo. 73, 200 P.2d 387 (1948). The event here was of the kind indicating negligence in the performance of an act which was within the scope of defendan......
-
Le Compte v. Wardell, No. 9790
...Cal.2d 133, 148 P.2d 19, 156 A.L.R. 1221; McGlone v. William Angus, Inc., 248 N.Y. 197, 161 N.E. 469; Krause v. Watson Bros. Transp. Co., 119 Colo. 73, 200 P.2d 387; Newman v. Fox West Coast Theatres, 86 Cal.App.2d 428, 194 P.2d 706, Annotation, 156 A.L.R. [134 Mont. 499] Likewise the part ......