Krenz v. XTO Energy, Inc.
| Docket Number | 20160096 |
| Decision Date | 16 February 2017 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
21 cases
-
Nw. Landowners Ass'n v. State
...... do not authorize [the mineral owner] to dispose of salt water generated from outside the Unit."); see also Krenz v. XTO Energy, Inc., 2017 ND 19, ¶ 42, 890 N.W.2d 222 ("[A] lessee generally cannot, in the absence of contractual permission, use the surface of one lease to benefit mining ......
-
Sorum v. State
...estate owner with an implied servitude for the owner or lessee of the mineral estate to develop the minerals. Krenz v. XTO Energy, Inc. , 2017 ND 19, ¶ 42, 890 N.W.2d 222 (citing Hunt Oil Co. v. Kerbaugh , 283 N.W.2d 131, 135 (N.D. 1979) ). Because the mineral estate is dominant over the su......
-
Close Armstrong, LLC v. Trunkline Gas Co.
...generally have continued to enforce floating easements outside of these occasional legislative prohibitions. See Krenz v. XTO Energy, Inc. , 890 N.W.2d 222, 233 (N.D. 2017) (law did not authorize a court to invalidate an otherwise binding and voluntary contract though statute was enacted to......
-
Dixon v. Dixon
...and simply because we may have viewed the evidence differently does not entitle us to reverse the court." Krenz v. XTO Energy, Inc. , 2017 ND 19, ¶ 18, 890 N.W.2d 222. Whether a contract contains a mistake sufficient to support a claim for reformation is a question of fact. Freidig v. Weed ......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
CHAPTER 6 HOW TO PROPERLY DRAFT AND USE THE POOLING CLAUSE
...Tech. L. Rev.877, 898-899 (2012). [73] Id. at 898. [74] See Section III.C.2. supra. [75] See, Krenz v. XTO Energy, Inc., 2017 ND 19, ¶50, 890 N.W.2d 222, 238-239. [76] Kramer, supra note 72 at 901-903. [77] Consider the circumstance where the primary term of a lease covering a non-drillsite......