Kronberg v. Hale, 12292.
| Decision Date | 29 May 1950 |
| Docket Number | No. 12292.,12292. |
| Citation | 181 F.2d 767 |
| Parties | KRONBERG v. HALE et al. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
William Farnum White, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
Frank J. Hennessy, U. S. Atty., and Joseph Karesh, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.
Before HEALY, McALLISTER and ORR, Circuit Judges.
Writ of Certiorari Denied May 29, 1950. See 70 S.Ct. 987.
Appellant has filed a petition denominated "petition for rehearing by the court in banc (and if denied) petition for the court to certify constitutional question to U. S. Supreme Court for decision."
The petition is stricken as being without authority in law or in the rules or practice of the court.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
Western Pac. RR Corp. v. Western Pac. R. Co.
...seek a rehearing en banc, they are stricken as being without authority in law or in the rules or practice of the court. See Kronberg v. Hale, 9 Cir., 181 F.2d 767. JAMES ALGER FEE, District Judge (dissenting and suggesting a rehearing en banc of all Circuit This cause involves the dispositi......
-
Western Pac Corp v. Western Pac Co Metzger v. Western Pac Co
...seek a rehearing en banc, they are stricken as being without authority in law or in the rules or practice of the court. See Kronberg v. Hale, 9 Cir., 181 F.2d 767.' The striking of petitioners' motion is certainly ambiguous. If we accord full legal significance to this order, we must conclu......
-
Western Pac. R. Corp. v. Western Pac. R. Co.
...seek a rehearing en banc, they are stricken as being without authority in law or in the rules or practice of this court. See Kronberg v. Hale, 9 Cir., 181 F.2d 767." This de novo consideration may lead to the conviction that, while it is useless for the same three judges themselves to rehea......