Kursheedt v. Standard Bleachery Company

Decision Date09 November 1908
CitationKursheedt v. Standard Bleachery Company, 71 A. 39, 77 N.J.L. 99 (N.J. 1908)
CourtNew Jersey Supreme Court
PartiesEDMUND B. KURSHEEDT ET AL. v. STANDARD BLEACHERY COMPANY ET AL

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Action by Edmund B. Kursheedt and others against the Standard Bleachery Company and others.Verdict for defendants.Order to show cause made absolute.

Argued, June term, 1908, before GUMMERE, C. J., and TRENCHARD and MINTURN, JJ.

Chauncey G. Parker and Francis H. Kinnicutt. for plaintiffs.

John M. Bell, for defendants.

TRENCHARD, J.The plaintiffs were in the business of making aprons from bleached goods called "lawn," and bought the goods unbleached "in the gray," as it is called, and at different times between January 1, 1905, and May, 1907, sent such goods amounting to 3,159,873 yards to the defendants' bleachery to be bleached.The plaintiffs' claim was that the process of bleaching caused a stretch or increase in the goods bleached, amounting to at least 1 per cent of the yardage, and that by the contract between the partiesthe plaintiffs were entitled to this stretch, and, notwithstanding the plaintiffs' rights, the defendants had appropriated the stretch to their own use.The defense seems to have been a denial that the goods had been stretched by the bleaching in the defendants' works.

The jury found a verdict for the defendants, whereupon the plaintiffs obtained a rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted on the grounds, among others, of newly discovered evidence and that the verdict was contrary to the weight of the evidence.

Reviewing the evidence before the jury, it appears that there was no substantial dispute that, under the contract between the parties, the plaintiffs were entitled to the stretch, if any, that arose from bleaching.To sustain the verdict for the defendants, the jury must...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • State v. Haines
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • January 30, 1956
    ...elements appear, caution must give way to reason and justice and the application for such relief granted. Kursheedt v. Standard Bleachery Co., 77 N.J.L. 99, 71 A. 39 (Sup.Ct.1909); Ellis v. F.L.C. Martin Automobile Co., 77 N.J.L. 339, 72 A. 438 (Sup.Ct.1909); Dundee Manufacturing Co. v. Van......
  • State v. Hunter
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • September 1, 1949
    ...courts. But when the elements justifying a new trial clearly appear, the application should be granted. Kursheedt v. Standard Bleacher Company, 77 N.J.L. 99, 71 A. 39 (Sup.Ct.1909); Ellis v. F. L. C. Martin Automobile Company, 77 N.J.L. 339, 72 A. 438, (Sup.Ct.1909); Dundee Manufacturing Co......
  • Plaskon v. National Sulphur Company
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • August 14, 1934
    ...diligence have been obtained; that it was material and went to the merit of the case and was not cumulative. Kursheedt v. Standard Bleachery Company, 77 N. J. Law, 99, 71 A. 39. Thereupon, on June 10, 1932, the deputy commissioner entered an order that the former judgment be opened, that th......
  • Walsh v. The Mayor and Common Council of The City of Newark
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • November 9, 1908