Kurz v. United States, 332

Decision Date30 April 1958
Docket NumberDocket 24952.,No. 332,332
Citation254 F.2d 811
PartiesCharles KURZ, Ruth C. Joseph, Thorkil Aschehoug, as Executors under the Last Will and Testament of Theodore H. Joseph, deceased, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit

Eugene L. Bondy, of Bondy & Schloss, New York City (Bertram Braufman, of Bondy & Schloss, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiffs-appellants.

Gerard L. Goettel, Asst. U. S. Atty., S.D.N.Y., New York City (Paul W. Williams, U. S. Atty., and Benjamin T. Richards, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Here the executors under a will are claiming a refund of estate taxes paid by them on the value of a trust estate as to which their testator had retained a power of revocation. They argue that this trust for the benefit of children carried into effect only a provision of a separation agreement between him and his wife which, indeed, called for the trust, but without power of revocation. As District Judge Palmieri points out, however, in his well reasoned opinion, D.C.S. D.N.Y., 156 F.Supp. 99,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • In re Singer Products Co., Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Eastern District of New York
    • August 8, 1989
    ...Lowell v. Twin Disc, Inc., 527 F.2d 767, 770 (2d Cir.1975); Kurz v. United States, 156 F.Supp. 99, 103-04 (S.D.N.Y.1957), aff'd, 254 F.2d 811 (2d Cir.1958). Since neither party has proffered any evidence to indicate whether either contract was intended to supersede the other, and as these t......
  • Roc Nation LLC v. HCC Int'l Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • March 4, 2021
    ...agreement, and is properly consulted in construing the Policy's terms. Olin Corp. , 704 F.3d at 99 ; See, e.g., Kurz v. United States , 254 F.2d 811, 812 (2d Cir. 1958) ("[I]t is both good sense and good law that these closely integrated" documents be construed together).Attempting to avoid......
  • Gordon v. Vincent Youmans, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • December 20, 1965
    ...and were not all between the same parties. Kurz v. United States, 156 F.Supp. 99, 103-104 (S.D.N.Y.1957), aff'd per curiam, 254 F.2d 811, 812 (2d Cir. 1958); Nau v. Vulcan Rail & Construction Co., 286 N.Y. 188, 36 N.E.2d 106 In Kurz, where the District Court held that the law of New York wa......
  • Bloor v. Shapiro
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • August 15, 1983
    ...International Harvester, 429 F.Supp. 341, 346 (S.D.N.Y.1977). Kurz v. United States, 156 F.Supp. 99, 103-04 (S.D.N.Y.1957), aff'd, 254 F.2d 811 (2d Cir.1958). Given the circumstances established on this motion, the possibility that the parties intended that the contracts be read together ca......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT