Kush v. City of Buffalo

Decision Date09 July 1982
Citation453 N.Y.S.2d 388,89 A.D.2d 786
PartiesDavid KUSH, infant, by Sally Marszalek, his mother and natural guardian, and Sally Marszalek, Individually, Respondents, v. CITY OF BUFFALO, Buffalo Board of Education, Appellants.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Joseph P. McNamara, Corp. Counsel, Buffalo by Carl Tronolone, Buffalo, for appellants. Paul William Beltz, P. C., Buffalo by Robert Nichols, Buffalo, for respondents.

Judgment unanimously modified and as modified affirmed, with costs to plaintiffs, in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiff concedes on appeal that the judgment against the City of Buffalo should be vacated. The Board of Education of the City of Buffalo is not a department of the City government; it is an independent corporate body (People ex rel Wells & Newton Co., of New York v. Craig, 232 N.Y. 125, 133 N.E. 419; H. & J. Floor Covering v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 66 A.D.2d 588, 593-594, 413 N.Y.S.2d 414). The interest on the judgment must be recomputed at a rate of 3% in compliance with the statute (see General Municipal Law, § 3-a). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, McGowan, J.--Negligence.)

DILLON, P. J., and HANCOCK, CALLAHAN, DOERR and SCHNEPP, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT