Kushner v. Southern Adventist Health & Hospital System, Inc., 57740

Decision Date20 September 1979
Docket NumberNo. 57740,57740
Citation260 S.E.2d 381,151 Ga.App. 425
PartiesKUSHNER v. SOUTHERN ADVENTIST HEALTH & HOSPITAL SYSTEM, INC.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

M. Jerome Elmore, Atlanta, for appellant.

Randall L. Hughes, Altanta, for appellee.

SMITH, Judge.

Appellant, Dr. Robert L. Kushner, Jr., asserts that the trial court erred in entering judgment on the pleadings in his action for breach of contract. We affirm.

Appellant entered into a medical services contract with appellee hospital, under which appellant was to provide appellee radiological services for renewable three year periods. Procedural requirements for termination or nonrenewal of the contract are contained in paragraph 11 which states: "The term of this Agreement shall be for three years and shall automatically be renewed for three years unless either party gives the other party at least 120 days written notice prior to the expiration of the three-year period. Thereafter, the agreement shall automatically be renewed for three-year periods unless either party gives the other party at least 120 days written notice prior to the expiration of such three-year periods.

"During the initial term of this Agreement or any renewal term thereof, the services of the Radiologist as set forth herein, shall not be terminated by the Hospital except after 120 days written notice and after a determination has been made that the Radiologist is not providing adequate radiological services under the terms of this Agreement. The initiation of this determination will be based upon a recommendation originating from the Medical/Dental staff. Further, no termination shall take effect without prior consultation with the Medical/Dental staff of the Hospital and without the Radiologist being afforded a hearing on all matters concerning any proposed termination." The initial three year period under the contract began on January 1, 1975, and ended on December 31, 1978. By letter dated August 21, 1978, appellant was given notice that his contract with appellee was not going to be renewed for another three-year period. In entering judgment on the pleadings, the trial court held that, as a matter of law, appellee's notice to appellant satisfied the nonrenewal provisions of the contract and therefore the contractual relationship had ended. Appellant asserts that notice alone did not satisfy the nonrenewal provisions of the contract. It is argued that, in addition to providing notice of nonrenewal, appellee was also required to make a determination, after a hearing, that appellant was not providing adequate radiological...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Rice v. Poppe
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • April 28, 2016
    ...227 S.E.2d at 806.31 Kushner v. McLarty, supra note 24.32 Id. at 400, 300 S.E.2d at 532.33 Kushner v. Sou. Adventist Health & Hospital System, 151 Ga.App. 425, 425–26, 260 S.E.2d 381, 382 (1979).34 Kushner v. McLarty, supra note 24, 165 Ga.App. at 403, 300 S.E.2d at 533.35 Id. at 402, 300 S......
  • Horne v. Drachman
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • July 14, 1981
    ...expound it as made.' Cato v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 164 Ga. 392, 398, 138 S.E. 787 (1927)." Kushner v. Southern Adventist Health and Hospital System, Inc., 151 Ga.App. 425, 427, 260 S.E.2d 381 (1979). c) Finally, appellants contend the contract is unenforceable due to lack of "mutuality." We ......
  • Brazeal v. Newpoint Media Grp., LLC.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • March 10, 2015
    ...LLC v. Multibank 2009–1 CRE Venture, LLC, 326 Ga.App. 322, 329(1)(b), 756 S.E.2d 558 (2014).In Kushner v. S. Adventist Health & Hosp. Sys., 151 Ga.App. 425, 426 –427(1), 260 S.E.2d 381 (1979), we addressed whether an employer's decision not to renew an employee's contract for an additional ......
  • De La Maria v. Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Georgia
    • July 8, 1985
    ...because of the difference between "termination" of the contract and "non-renewal" of the contract. Kushner v. Southern Adventist Health & System, 151 Ga.App. 425, 260 S.E.2d 381 (1979). The doctor then sued his attorney claiming that the contract was negligently drafted. The lower court gra......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT