Kusi v. State, 148 Sept.Term 2013
| Decision Date | 03 July 2013 |
| Docket Number | No. 148 Sept.Term 2013,148 Sept.Term 2013 |
| Parties | George Kusi v. State of Maryland |
| Court | Maryland Court of Appeals |
Opinion of the Court of Special Appeals unreported (No. 352, Sept. Term, 2012).
Disposition: Granted.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
Kusi v. State, 62
...which, he asserts, was the wrong standard of appellate review. Kusi petitioned this Court for a writ of certiorari, which was granted. 432 Md. 466, 69 A.3d 474 (2013). In his petition, Kusi presented the following question: [91 A.3d 1195] Did the Court of Special Appeals err in applying a ‘......
-
Spivery-Jones v. (In re Receivership Estate of Trans Healthcare, Inc.), 66
...arguments will conclusively determine the propriety of the receivership?Spivery–Jones v. Receivership Estate of Trans Healthcare, Inc., 432 Md. 466, 69 A.3d 474 (2013). “[A]ppeals must be taken from final judgments, except under certain limited exceptions.” Addison v. Lochearn Nursing Home,......
-
Kusi v. State, 62
...which, he asserts, was the wrong standard of appellate review. Kusi petitioned this Court for a writ of certiorari, which was granted. 432 Md. 466, 69 A.3d 474 (2013). In his petition, Kusi presented the following question:Did the Court of Special Appeals err in applying a 'clearly erroneou......