Kwikie Minit Markets, Inc. v. Hutner
Decision Date | 22 February 1973 |
Docket Number | No. 3--972A57,3--972A57 |
Citation | 155 Ind.App. 307,292 N.E.2d 832 |
Parties | KWIKIE MINIT MARKETS, INC., et al., Appellants, v. David S. HUTNER, Appellee. |
Court | Indiana Appellate Court |
J. A. Bruggeman, William F. McNagny, James M. Prickett, Barrett, Barrett & McNagny, Fort Wayne, for appellants.
Stephen D. Long, William Salin, Kennerk, Dumas, Burke & Backs, Fort Wayne, for appellee.
NATURE OF THE APPEAL: Kwikie Minit Markets was incorporated in 1962, to engage in the grocery business in Fort Wayne, Inaiana. The capitalization of the corporation was effected by the issuance of stock and debentures to David S. Hutner, hereinafter referred to as Hunter, and Haskell B. Schultz, Richard Means, John N. Welch, Robert E. Meyers and Richard Lehman, hereinafter referred to as the Directors. Hutner received 100 shares of common stock and six (6) bonds with a face value of $1,000.00. The corporation did not do as well as the investors had hoped and in an effort to improve the financial picture of the corporation, the Directors passed a resolution whereby bonds could be converted into common stock. All the investors except Hutner converted their bonds into common stock.
President-Director Schultz corresponded with Hutner concerning the conversion of his bonds. Hutner answered that he would not convert. The business of the corporation did not improve. Two years later, the Directors authorized a liquidation of assets and made a distribution. Hutner was not reimbursed for the face amount of his bonds.
Hutner brought suit against the corporation and the Directors to recover the principal and interest due on his bonds. After all pleadings, interrogatories and admissions of fact had been filed, Hutner filed a motion for summary judgment. The trial court granted the motion for summary judgment.
The issues presented in the Directors' brief, which will be discussed in our opinion, may be summarized as follows:
1. Did the affidavit, interrogatories and requests for admissions properly present to the trial court for its consideration on summary judgment the affirmative defense of estoppel?
2. Did the Directors properly raise the issue of contractual waiver for the trial court in their motion to correct errors to preserve the issue on appeal?
In our opinion which follows, we hold that the affirmative defense of estoppel was not properly presented to the trial court for its consideration upon a motion for summary judgment and that the issue of contractual waiver was not mentioned or referred to in the motion to correct errors. We affirm the judgment of the trial court in our opinion.
However, the Directors rescinded the above resolution and issued the following resolution on November 10, 1966:
On the same day that the above resolution was issued, November 10, 1966, a notice of redemption was issued to David S. Hutner. Several letters were exchanged between Haskell B. Schultz, President of the corporation, and David S. Hutner concerning the conversion. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this correspondence is that Hutner declined to convert his bonds into common stock and further declined to invest any further monies in the corporation.
The corporation continued to do business for an additional two years without financial improvement. Finally, the Board of Directors passed a resolution to dissolve the corporation. After all the assets were converted into liquid assets and after pay off of all outstanding debts, a partial distribution of assets was made. No money was paid to Hutner on his outstanding bonds. It was also admitted by Schultz that Hutner never signed the notice...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Crider v. State Exchange Bank of Culver
...Otherwise, the issue is waived on appeal. Lafary v. Lafary (1985) 4th Dist.Ind.App., 476 N.E.2d 155, 159; Kwikie Minit Markets, Inc. v. Hutner (1973) 155 Ind.App. 307, 292 N.E.2d 832. In the instant case, Crider had the burden of pleading and proving the affirmative defense of failure of co......
-
Lawshe v. Glen Park Lumber Co., Inc., 3-777A185
...him lawfully authorized, excepting however, leases not exceeding the term of three (3) years."3 TR. 8(C); Kwikie Minit Markets, Inc. v. Hutner (1973), 155 Ind.App. 307, 292 N.E.2d 832.4 TR. 15(B); Hidden Valley Lake, Inc. v. Kersey (1976), Ind.App., 348 N.E.2d ...
-
Linden Packing Co., Inc. v. Heinold Hog Market, Inc.
.... and any other matter constituting an avoidance, matter of abatement, or affirmative defense. . . .' Also see Kwikie Minit Markets, Inc. v. Huter (1973), ind.App., 292 N.E.2d 832 and Rembold Motors, Inc. v. Bonfield (1973), Ind.App., 293 N.E.2d Linden Packing Co., Inc. answered all of the ......
- Slagle v. Slagle