Kyle v. Rippey

Decision Date06 April 1891
Citation20 Or. 446,26 P. 308
PartiesKYLE v. RIPPEY et al.
CourtOregon Supreme Court

Appeal from circuit court, Jackson county; L.R. WEBSTER, Judge.

The questions of law argued on this appeal arise on the findings of the trial court, which are as follows:

"(1) On the 17th of April, 1889, the plaintiff and defendants made an agreement that, if the plaintiff, who was a real-estate agent, would sell for the defendants a certain tract of land containing two hundred and fifty acres, owned by them, they would pay him two hundred and fifty dollars for his services in making such sale. There was no time stated in this agreement wherein this sale was to be made.

"(2) On the 17th of April, 1889, the plaintiff began negotiations with one E.C. Kane for the sale of said land to him, and as the result of said negotiations Kane orally agreed to purchase the land at the price, and, upon the terms, as set out in the written agreement, which is incorporated in the third finding of facts herein. It was admitted upon the trial that Kane was able to purchase this land.

"(3) Plaintiff prepared a written agreement containing the terms of the proposed sale, which the defendant signed. Kane did not sign this agreement, though he was willing to do so afterwards thought he had signed it, and it was through an oversight, and for no other reason, that he did not sign it. The agreement is as follows: 'Articles of Agreement for Warranty Deed. Articles of agreement made this 17th day of April in the year of our Lord eighteen hundred and eighty-nine, (1889,) between Chas. G. Rippey and Frank Amy both of Central Point, Jackson county, Oregon, parties of the first part, and E. C. Kane, of Ashland, Jackson county Oregon, party of the second part, witnesseth: That the said parties of the first part hereby covenant and agree that, if the party of the second part shall first make the payments and perform the covenants hereinafter mentioned on his part to be made and performed, the said parties of the first part will convey and assure the party of the second part in fee-simple, clear of all incumbrances whatsoever by a good and sufficient warranty deed and abstract of title, the following lot, piece, or parcel of ground, viz.: The west two hundred and fifty (250) acres of what is known as the "Watson Place," and situate about one mile north of Central Point, Oregon, and further described as the two hundred and fifty acres lying adjacent to the railroad track. And the said party of the second part hereby covenants and agrees to pay to the said parties of the first part the sum of forty dollars ($40) per acre, and is to take two hundred and fifty acres, more or less, according to the following provisions, viz.: If there be, when surveyed, two hundred and fifty acres on the west or north-west side of Bear creek, or further described as the portion adjacent to the railroad track, then the party of the second part agrees to take two hundred and fifty acres of land; but if it should appear from the survey, in getting together two hundred and fifty acres of land, that five acres, or less than five acres, should come on the east or north-eastside of said stream, the parties of the first part agree to keep that amount out of the two hundred and fifty acres; and the party of the second part also agrees that if more than five acres should by a survey be shown to come on the east or north-east side of said stream, and being a part and parcel necessary to make the said two hundred and fifty acres, then the party of the second part agrees to accept of said land on the east or north-east side of said stream. Payments to be made in the following manner, viz.: Five hundred dollars in hand paid the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, and the balance in two payments, as follows, viz.: Three thousand dollars at the time of the delivery of a good and sufficient warranty deed and abstract of title to said land; six thousand five hundred dollars on or before three years from date of last above payment, interest to be paid at the rate of eight percent, per annum on deferred payments, payable annually all in U.S. gold coin of the United States; the latter amount, six thousand five hundred dollars, to be secured by a note and mortgage on said land; and it is understood that said mortgage shall be released on part or all of said land at any time that the party of the second part may pay the amount due; and, in case of any failure of the party of the second part to make any of the payments or perform any of the covenants on his part hereby made and entered into, this contract shall, at the option of the parties of the first part, be forfeited and determined, and the party of the second part shall forfeit all claims made by him on this contract, and such payments shall be retained by said parties of the first part in full satisfaction and liquidation of all damages by them sustained, and they shall have the right to re-enter and take possession of the premises aforesaid, with all the improvements and appurtenances thereunto belonging. It is also mutually agreed that all the covenants and agreements herein contained shall extend to and be obligatory upon the heirs, administrators, and assigns of the respective parties. In evidence whereof the parties of these presents have hereunto set their hands and seals the day and year first above written. [ Seal] CHAS. G. RIPPEY. [ Seal] FRANK AMY. Done in the presence of C.W. AYERS, FRANK LENNART, A.T KYLE, Jr.'

"(4) As soon as the contract set out in the third finding of fact was signed by the defendants, Kane paid them five hundred dollars under said contract, which they accepted.

"(5) Within a short time after the execution of the agreement as set out in the third finding of fact, and the payment of the five hundred dollars thereunder as set out in the fourth finding of fact, the defendants furnished to Kane an abstract of title of the land mentioned in said agreement, prepared by an abstractor mutually agreed upon by Kane and the defendants. Kane submitted this abstract to his attorney, who advised him that the title of the defendants to said land was defective.

"(6) Within a short time after said abstract mentioned in the fifth finding of fact had been furnished, the defendants executed their warranty deed for said land to said Kane, and tendered the same to him, and they were willing and ready to complete the sale of said land to him.

"(7) Kane refused to accept the deed so tendered to him as found in the sixth finding of fact, and refused to accept the land under said deed, and refused to complete the purchase of said land, and to pay therefor, as provided in the agreement alleging as a reason for such refusal that the title of said defendants was not...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • W. A. Lucas & Co. v. Thompson
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • June 25, 1930
    ...Rep. 348, the Supreme Court of Minnesota in Gauthier v. West, 45 Minn. 192, 47 N. W. 656, and the Supreme Court of Oregon in Kyle v. Rippey, 20 Or. 446, 26 P. 310, and has been followed by the Courts of Civil Appeals of this state in several cases, among which may be noted Gibson v. Gray, 1......
  • Everson v. Phelps
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • April 27, 1922
    ...will not be permitted to accept that portion of his agent's work that is to his advantage and repudiate the residue. Kyle v. Rippey, 20 Or. 446, 26 P. 308. made the further contention that no evidence was offered by plaintiff showing that Reding was ready, able, and willing to make the purc......
  • Dillard v. Olalla Min. Co.
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • July 21, 1908
    ... ... sale of realty or other business dealings. Coleman v ... Stark, 1 Or. 115, 118; Wood v. Rayburn, 18 Or ... 1, 22 P. 521; Kyle v. Rippey, 20 Or. 446, 454, 26 P ... 308; Rayburn v. Davisson, 22 Or. 242, 29 P. 738; ... La Grande Nat. Bank v. Blum, 27 Or. 215, 41 P ... ...
  • York v. Nash
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • January 12, 1903
    ...terms offered, and, if Nash then refused to sell, he is entitled to his commission ( Fisk v. Henarie, 13 Or. 156, 9 P. 322; Kyle v. Rippey, 20 Or. 446, 26 P. 308), the previous verbal agreement between Nash and Lane is a defense. It is admitted that the plaintiff did not have the exclusive ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT