L. B. v. United States

Decision Date23 September 2022
Docket Number20-35514
Citation49 F.4th 1241 (Mem)
Parties L. B., individually and on behalf of D.B., a minor, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Bureau of Indian Affairs; Dana Bullcoming, agent of the Bureau of Indian Affairs sued in his individual capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

Timothy M. Bechtold (argued), Bechtold Law Firm PLLC, Missoula, Montana; John Heenan, Heenan & Cook, Billings, Montana; for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Timothy A. Tatarka (argued), Assistant United States Attorney; Kurt G. Alme, United States Attorney; United States Attorney's Office, Billings, Montana; for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: Mary H. Murguia, Chief Judge, and Danny J. Boggs* and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

In light of the Montana Supreme Court's August 16, 2022, opinion in response to this Court's August 6, 2021, certification order, this case is reversed and remanded to the district court for further proceedings. See L.B. v. United States , 2022 MT 166, ¶ 26, 515 P.3d 818 ("The certified facts establish that Officer Bullcoming was not, as a matter of law, acting outside the scope of his employment when he sexually assaulted L.B. and the question is one for a trier of fact.").

Appellee's motion for leave to file supplemental briefing is DENIED (Doc. 46).

A copy of this order shall serve as the mandate of this court.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

* The Honorable Danny J. Boggs, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit,...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT