L. A. Cnty. v. Castro
| Decision Date | 23 January 2017 |
| Docket Number | No. 16–655.,16–655. |
| Citation | 197 L.Ed.2d 69,137 S.Ct. 831 (Mem) |
| Parties | LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, et al., petitioners, v. Jonathan Michael CASTRO. |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
132 cases
-
Comm. for Pub. Counsel Servs. v. Barnstable Cnty. Sheriff's Office
... ... County of Lake , 900 F.3d 335, 352-353 (7th Cir. 2018) ( Kingsley s objective standard applies to pretrial detainees Fourteenth Amendment claims regarding conditions of confinement and inadequate medical care), Darnell v. Pineiro , 849 F.3d 17, 33-36 (2d Cir. 2017) (same), and Castro v. County of Los Angeles , 833 F.3d 1060, 1071 (9th Cir. 2016) (en banc), cert. denied, U.S. , 137 S. Ct. 831, 197 L.Ed.2d 69 (2017) (same as to pretrial detainees Fourteenth Amendment claims of failure to protect), with Whitney v. St. Louis , 887 F.3d 857, 859 & 860 n.4 (8th Cir. 2018) ( ... ...
-
Westmoreland v. Butler Cnty.
... ... 2022). Following Brawner , a pretrial detainee establishes deliberate indifference by proving "more than negligence but less than subjective intentsomething akin to reckless disregard." Brawner , 14 F.4th at 59697 (quoting Castro v. Cnty. of L.A. , 833 F.3d 1060, 1071 (9th Cir. 2016) (en banc)). A defendant must have acted deliberately (not accidentally) and recklessly "in the face of an unjustifiably high risk of harm that is either known or so obvious that it should be known." Id. at 596 (quoting Farmer , 511 U.S. at ... ...
-
Pierce v. Cnty. of Marin
...2018 ; Castro v. Cty. of Los Angeles , 833 F.3d 1060, 1073 (9th Cir. 2016), cert. denied sub nom. Los Angeles Cty., Cal. v. Castro , ––– U.S. ––––, 137 S.Ct. 831, 197 L.Ed.2d 69 (2017). In addition, local governments may be held liable for acts of omission, such as a failure to train, commi......
-
Miranda v. Cnty. of Lake
... ... Though Kingsley 's direct holding spoke only of excessive-force claims, two of our sister circuits have held that its logic is not so constrained. The Ninth Circuit first extended Kingsley 's objective inquiry to detainees' Fourteenth-Amendment failure-to-protect claims. Castro v. Cnty. of L.A. , 833 F.3d 1060, 107071 (9th Cir. 2016) ( en banc ), cert. denied , U.S. , 137 S.Ct. 831, 197 L.Ed.2d 69 (2017). Since then, that court has applied the Kingsley holding more broadly to a medical-need claim brought by a pretrial detainee. Gordon v. Cnty. of Orange , 888 ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results