L.I. City Ventures v. Urban Compass, Inc.
Decision Date | 16 January 2019 |
Docket Number | 18 Civ. 5853 (PGG) |
Parties | L.I. CITY VENTURES, d/b/a/ MODERN SPACES, Plaintiff, v. URBAN COMPASS, INC., d/b/a/ COMPASS, and JESSICA MEIS, Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York |
Plaintiff L.I. City Ventures, LLC, d/b/a Modern Spaces ("Modern Spaces"), asserts claims against Urban Compass, Inc., d/b/a Compass, and Jessica Meis for breach of contract, tortious interference with contract, misappropriation of trade secrets, unfair competition, and tortious interference with prospective economic relations. Modern Spaces and Urban Compass are competing real estate brokerage firms, and Meis is a real estate agent who formerly worked at Modern Spaces, but who now works for Urban Compass. (See Am. Cmplt. (Dkt. No. 1-2) ¶ 1; Benaim Aff. (Dkt. No. 10-2) ¶¶ 7, 17; Meis Aff. (Dkt. No. 24) ¶¶ 2-4) Plaintiff claims that - prior to Meis' departure from Modern Spaces in January 2018 - she emailed numerous documents containing Plaintiff's trade secret information to her personal email account. Plaintiff also claims that Meis thereafter shared Plaintiff's trade secret information with Urban Compass.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction enjoining Defendants from, inter alia, using or disclosing Plaintiff's trade secret information or soliciting Modern Spaces' clients. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff's motion will be denied.
and (2) "using or disclosing to third parties, including without limitation [Urban] Compass, Modern Spaces' Proprietary Information." (State TRO (Dkt. No. 10-7)) Although the TRO was signed on June 19, 2018, it was not filed until June 28, 2018. (Id.)
On June 28, 2018 - the same day that the state court TRO was filed - Defendants removed this action to federal court. (See Notice of Removal (Dkt. No. 1))1 On July 12, 2018, Plaintiff filed a motion to extend the state court's temporary restraining order, and requested that this court enter a preliminary injunction granting Plaintiff broader relief than that provided in the TRO. The Court scheduled a hearing on the application to extend the temporary restraining order and to issue a preliminary injunction for July 20, 2018. (Order (Dkt. No. 12)) The parties subsequently stipulated to an adjournment of that hearing to September 5, 2018, and further stipulated to the entry of a TRO "pending a decision on plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction, with the exception that Jessica Meis will be allowed to use her personal contacts, including her Google Contact list." (July 16, 2018 Defs. Ltr. (Dkt. No. 13) at 1; July 17, 2018 Jt. Ltr. (Dkt. No. 16))
Plaintiff's filings in support of its request for a preliminary injunction assert that - prior to Meis's departure from Modern Spaces - she had emailed to herself numerous documents containing Modern Spaces' trade secret information, in violation of her Independent Contractor Agreement with Modern Spaces. (See Pltf. Br. (Dkt. No. 11) at 9-10, 17-19; Pltf. Reply Br. (Dkt. No. 29) at 5, 10-13) However, Plaintiff did not provide the Court with copies of the documents allegedly containing trade secret information, nor did Plaintiff adequately explain why the information contained in these documents constitutes trade secrets.
At the September 5, 2018 hearing, the Court informed the parties that it could not rule on the motion for a preliminary injunction until Plaintiff identified the information it believes constitutes trade secrets. (Sept. 5, 2018 Tr. (Dkt. No. 47) at 5) The parties then requested the opportunity to participate in a settlement conference. (Id. at 31, 36)
The parties' settlement discussions were not successful. Accordingly, on November 14, 2018, the Court ordered Plaintiff to submit "(1) a clear list of what Plaintiff claims is the proprietary, confidential, trade secret information that Defendant Meis took when she ceased working for Plaintiff; (2) the actual files Plaintiff claims Defendant Meis forwarded to her personal e-mail, rather than only the cover emails; and (3) legal authority demonstrating that these materials constitute trade secret information." (See Order (Dkt. No. 40))
Plaintiff subsequently submitted a supplemental reply declaration, along with three documents that Plaintiff argued "undoubtedly constitute proprietary and/or trade secret information."2 (See Levaia Supp. Reply. Decl. (Dkt. No. 42) ¶ 5) Plaintiff also submitted a brief arguing that these documents constitute trade secrets under both federal and New York law. Defendants, in response, submitted, inter alia, a copy of the Independent Contractor Agreement between Modern Spaces and Meis. (Meis Supp. Aff., Ex. A (Dkt. No. 46-2) at 11-16) Defendants also submitted a supplemental brief disputing Plaintiff's claim that the three exhibits submitted to the Court contain trade secrets. (Defs. Supp. Br. in Opp. (Dkt. No. 46-1))
Between the summer or fall of 2016 and January 2018, Meis worked as a real estate agent for Modern Spaces. (Benaim Aff. (Dkt. No. 10-2) ¶ 7; Meis Aff. (Dkt. No. 24) at ¶ 3)3 In July 2017, Meis and Modern Spaces executed an agreement governing Meis's work for Modern Spaces (the "Agreement"). (Meis Supp. Aff., Ex. A (Dkt. No. 46-2) at 11-16)
The Agreement contains several provisions addressing Modern Spaces' "Proprietary Information":
(See Meis Supp. Aff., Ex. A (Dkt. No. 46-2) ¶¶ 7, 10)
Other provisions in the Agreement emphasize Meis's status as an independent contractor, and acknowledge that Meis would solicit brokerage business beyond Plaintiff's own listings and clients:
To continue reading
Request your trial