L & M Plumbing, Inc. v. Decker
Decision Date | 18 September 1995 |
Citation | 219 A.D.2d 619,631 N.Y.S.2d 393 |
Parties | L & M PLUMBING, INC., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Harris Andrew DECKER, et al., Defendants-Appellants, Window-Tech, Inc., Defendant-Respondent, et al., Defendants. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Tenzer, Greenblatt, Fallon & Kaplan, New York City (Harris N. Cogan and Amal Aly, of counsel), for defendants-appellants.
David I. Grauer, White Plains, for plaintiff-respondent.
Before MANGANO, P.J., and JOY, KRAUSMAN and FLORIO, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
In an action, inter alia, to foreclose a mechanic's lien, the defendants Harris Andrew Decker and Anna Spector Decker appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), entered March 2, 1994, which denied their motion, in effect, to set aside an oral decision of the same court which, after a nonjury trial awarded damages to the plaintiff and the defendant Window-Tech, Inc., and (2) a judgment of the same court dated March 14, 1994, which is in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $63,756 and the defendant Window-Tech, Inc. in the sum of $39,493.74, including punitive damages and attorney's fees.
ORDERED that the appellants are awarded one bill of costs.
The Supreme Court erred in awarding judgment in favor of the plaintiff and the defendant Window-Tech, Inc. (hereinafter Window-Tech) since the plaintiff's mechanic's lien terminated by operation of law on May 9, 1993, three years after it was extended by the plaintiff's filing of the notice of pendency, and the respondent Window-Tech failed to submit any evidence showing that it timely filed such a notice of pendency (see, Lien Law § 17; CPLR 6513; Sunny Constr. v. Revella, 131 A.D.2d 560, 516 N.Y.S.2d 486; Modular Steel Systems v. Avlis Contr. Corp., 89 A.D.2d 891, 453 N.Y.S.2d 455; Spartan Concrete Corp. v. Harbour Val. Homes, 71 A.D.2d 950, 420 N.Y.S.2d 14).
Moreover, neither the plaintiff nor Window-Tech has demonstrated that the defendants diverted and/or misappropriated trust assets in violation of Lien Law article 3-A (cf., Caristo Constr. Corp. v. Diners Fin. Corp., 21 N.Y.2d 507, ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Matter of Cook v. Carmen Pariso Inc.
...§§ 17, 19 [2]; Gallo Bros. Constr. v Peccolo, 281 A.D.2d 811, 813; Green Elec. Contrs. v SMG Constr., 279 A.D.2d 287; L & M Plumbing v Decker, 219 A.D.2d 619, 619-620, lv denied 87 N.Y.2d 806; Matter of Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland, 75 A.D.2d 707; Matter of Thirty-Fifth St. & Fifth Av......
- Hunt v. Pole Bridge Hunting Club, Inc.
-
A.C. Green Electrical Contractors v. SMG Constr.
...of such notices having been obtained (Lien Law §§ 17, 19[2]; CPLR 6513, 6514[a]; see, Luzon v Perlman, 255 A.D.2d 162; L & M Plumbing v Decker, 219 A.D.2d 619, lv denied 87 N.Y.2d 806). In response to plaintiff's request, we hold that plaintiff may not commence a new action under CPLR 205, ......
-
L & M Plumbing, Inc. v. Decker
...597 87 N.Y.2d 806, 664 N.E.2d 508 L&M Plumbing, Inc. v. Harris Andrew Decker NO. 1489 Court of Appeals of New York Jan 16, 1996 219 A.D.2d 619, 631 N.Y.S.2d 393 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO GRANTED OR DENIED. Denied. ...
-
I. How Long Does A Lien Last on A Private Improvement?
...Grp., Inc., P.C. v. X & Y Dev. Grp., LLC, 88 A.D.3d 768; 930 N.Y.S.2d 652 (2d Dep't 2011).[229] L & M Plumbing, Inc. v. Decker, 219 A.D.2d 619, 631 N.Y.S.2d 393 (2d Dep't 1995); cf. Crossland Sav., F.S.B. v. Sutton E. Assocs. No. 88, 271 A.D.2d 276, 707 N.Y.S.2d 147 (1st Dep't 2000) (expira......