Lacey v. Lacey, No. 96-63

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Wyoming
Writing for the CourtBefore TAYLOR; GOLDEN
Citation925 P.2d 237
PartiesKevin Ross LACEY, Appellant (Plaintiff), v. Diane LACEY, Appellee (Defendant).
Docket NumberNo. 96-63
Decision Date15 October 1996

Page 237

925 P.2d 237
Kevin Ross LACEY, Appellant (Plaintiff),
v.
Diane LACEY, Appellee (Defendant).
No. 96-63.
Supreme Court of Wyoming.
Oct. 15, 1996.

Page 238

Kevin Ross Lacey, Pro Se.

No appearance for Appellee (Defendant).

Before TAYLOR, C.J., and THOMAS, MACY, GOLDEN and LEHMAN, JJ.

GOLDEN, Justice.

Appellant Kevin Ross Lacey appeals the denial of his motion requesting an order directing the Attorney General of the state of Alaska to locate his former wife and his son. Finding the district court has no jurisdiction to grant this requested relief, we affirm.

Lacey, acting pro se, has not provided the Court with a statement of the issues presented for review. His wife, Diane Stewart, did not submit a brief. Although Lacey has not complied with our rules of appellate procedure, we proceed with our review because the record is straightforward and the jurisdictional issue is obvious and dispositive. Furman v. Rural Elec. Co., 869 P.2d 136, 139 (Wyo.1994).

FACTS

Lacey was sentenced to state prison for crimes against his wife, Stewart, then pregnant with their son. On February 20, 1992, Lacey was granted a divorce from Stewart. Stewart was awarded the custody of the child and the decree stated she could bring the child for visitation at her own discretion. On December 29, 1994, Lacey moved to modify custody after Stewart did not bring the child for visitation for 32 months. The district court issued an order modifying visitation from Stewart's discretion to monthly visitation and on holidays. The modification also ordered Stewart not to remove the child from the state of Wyoming.

When Stewart still did not bring the child for the ordered visitation, Lacey petitioned the court to initiate contempt proceedings against her. Apparently, Stewart then moved to Alaska with the child. Lacey contended that documents he received from the Child Support Enforcement Division of the Alaska attorney general's office confirmed that Stewart had moved to Alaska. Lacey requested her address from them, but never received it. Lacey then requested that the district court issue an order directing the Alaska Attorney General to notify the court and Lacey of Stewart's address. No ruling was made and Lacey renewed his motion. The court ruled that the request for the order was denied without explanation. Lacey then sought and received a clarification explaining that the district court did not have jurisdiction to issue the order. This appeal followed.

DISCUSSIO
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 practice notes
  • Director, Office of State Lands v. Merbanco, No. 01-261
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Wyoming
    • June 6, 2003
    ...to "`the power to hear and determine cases of the general class to which the proceedings in question belong.'" Lacey v. Lacey, 925 P.2d 237, 238 (Wyo.1996) (quoting Fuller v. State, 568 P.2d 900, 903 (Wyo.1977)). The district court's subject matter jurisdiction was invoked through......
  • Weller v. Weller, No. 97-210
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Wyoming
    • June 9, 1998
    ...is 'the power to hear and determine cases of the general class to which the proceedings in question belong.' " Lacey v. Lacey, 925 P.2d 237, 238 (Wyo.1996) (quoting Fuller v. State, 568 P.2d 900, 903 (Wyo.1977)). It either exists or it does not, and a court should be satisfied that it ......
  • Woodie v. Whitesell, S-19-0047
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Wyoming
    • November 14, 2019
    ...is ‘the power to hear and determine cases of the general class to which the proceedings in question belong.’ " Lacey v. Lacey , 925 P.2d 237, 238 (Wyo. 1996) (quoting Fuller v. State , 568 P.2d 900, 903 (Wyo. 1977) ). Wyoming courts derive their subject matter jurisdiction from the Wyo......
  • Diamond B Services, Inc. v. Rohde, No. 04-258.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Wyoming
    • October 6, 2005
    ...to "the power to hear and determine cases of the general class to which the proceedings in question belong." Lacey v. Lacey, 925 P.2d 237, 238 (Wyo.1996) (quoting Fuller v. State, 568 P.2d 900, 903 (Wyo.1977)). Like a court, an administrative agency is required to have subject mat......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
  • Director, Office of State Lands v. Merbanco, No. 01-261
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Wyoming
    • June 6, 2003
    ...to "`the power to hear and determine cases of the general class to which the proceedings in question belong.'" Lacey v. Lacey, 925 P.2d 237, 238 (Wyo.1996) (quoting Fuller v. State, 568 P.2d 900, 903 (Wyo.1977)). The district court's subject matter jurisdiction was invoked through......
  • Weller v. Weller, No. 97-210
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Wyoming
    • June 9, 1998
    ...is 'the power to hear and determine cases of the general class to which the proceedings in question belong.' " Lacey v. Lacey, 925 P.2d 237, 238 (Wyo.1996) (quoting Fuller v. State, 568 P.2d 900, 903 (Wyo.1977)). It either exists or it does not, and a court should be satisfied that it ......
  • Woodie v. Whitesell, S-19-0047
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Wyoming
    • November 14, 2019
    ...is ‘the power to hear and determine cases of the general class to which the proceedings in question belong.’ " Lacey v. Lacey , 925 P.2d 237, 238 (Wyo. 1996) (quoting Fuller v. State , 568 P.2d 900, 903 (Wyo. 1977) ). Wyoming courts derive their subject matter jurisdiction from the Wyo......
  • Diamond B Services, Inc. v. Rohde, No. 04-258.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Wyoming
    • October 6, 2005
    ...to "the power to hear and determine cases of the general class to which the proceedings in question belong." Lacey v. Lacey, 925 P.2d 237, 238 (Wyo.1996) (quoting Fuller v. State, 568 P.2d 900, 903 (Wyo.1977)). Like a court, an administrative agency is required to have subject mat......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT