LaChance v. State
| Docket Number | 62129 |
| Decision Date | 03 April 2014 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
66 cases
-
Sena v. State
...on double jeopardy grounds before the district court, he is entitled to only a plain error review on appeal. LaChance v. State, 130 Nev. 263, 272-73, 321 P.3d 919, 926 (2014). The Double Jeopardy Clause protects against "multiple punishments for the same offense." Jackson , 128 Nev. at 604,......
-
Morrison v. State
...Because Morrison withdrew his request for self-representation, he invited any alleged error in this regard. See LaChance v. State, 130 Nev. 263, 276, 321 P.3d 919, 928 (2014) (holding that "a party will not be heard to complain on appeal of errors which he himself has induced or provoked").......
-
Rivas-Valenzuela v. State
...that Tremaine's injuries established the requisite harm. See NRS 0.060 (defining substantial bodily harm); LaChance v. State , 130 Nev. 263, 271-72, 321 P.3d 919, 925-26 (2014) (holding physical suffering that lasts longer than the pain immediately resulting from the wrongful act establishe......
-
Johnson v. State
...as a habitual offender merely because the defendant was convicted of at least three separate prior felonies. LaChance v. State, 130 Nev. ––––, ––––, 321 P.3d 919, 930 (2014). Nevertheless, a district court may exercise discretion to “dismiss a count under NRS 207.010 when the prior offenses......
Get Started for Free