Lachowicz v. Rugens
| Decision Date | 20 May 2010 |
| Citation | 297 Conn. 901,994 A.2d 1287 |
| Parties | Ami LACHOWICZv.Matthew RUGENS. |
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
Laura Ondrush, in support of the petition.
Peter D. Clark, in opposition.
The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 119 Conn.App. 866, 989 A.2d 651 (2010), is denied.
VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
Cannizzaro v. Marinyak
...at hand." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Lachowicz v. Rugens, 119 Conn. App. 866, 868, 989 A.2d 651, cert. denied, 297 Conn. 901, 994 A.2d 1287 (2010). Accordingly, our review of this issue is plenary.I With respect to the duty of care owed by an employer to a third party injured by an......
-
Sic v. Nunan-Dissent
...cannot recover in negligence from the defendant. Lachowicz v. Rugens, 119 Conn. App. 866, 868, 989 A.2d 651, cert. denied, 297 Conn. 901,994 A.2d 1287 (2010). ''[T]he issue of whether a defendant owes a duty of care is an appropriate matter for summary judgment because the question is one o......