Lack v. Western Loan & Building Co., 10158.
Decision Date | 21 May 1943 |
Docket Number | No. 10158.,10158. |
Citation | 134 F.2d 1017 |
Parties | LACK v. WESTERN LOAN & BUILDING CO. et al. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
John L. Schaefer and Henry S. Dottenheim, both of Los Angeles, Cal. (Henry S. Dottenheim, of Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel), for appellant.
George E. Lindelof, Jr., of Los Angeles, Cal., and H. L. Mulliner, of Salt Lake City, Utah, for appellee, Western Loan & Building Co.
Before MATHEWS, STEPHENS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.
In the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of California, Western Loan and Building Company, a Utah corporation, hereafter called Western, brought an action against F. S. Lack, a citizen of California, and Pearl Assurance Company, Limited, a British corporation, hereafter called Pearl. Western prayed judgment against Pearl for $28,067.87 and prayed judgment against Lack quieting Western's title to the $28,067.87. Lack answered, praying judgment against Western for $28,067.87. Pearl deposited $28,067.87 in the registry of the court, there to abide the judgment of the court, and filed an answer stating that it had done so and praying to be discharged from further liability.1
In a State court of California, Lack brought an action against Western for specific performance of a contract between him and Western or (in lieu thereof) damages in the sum of $100,217.87, and for such other relief as might seem meet and just. On petition of Western, this action was removed from the State court to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of California. There Western answered, praying that Lack take nothing, and that Western have judgment quieting its title to a building called the Hotel Dunlack in Brawley, California, the land on which the building stood, and all furniture, furnishings, fixtures and equipment2 located in the building.
The actions were consolidated, trial was had, findings of fact and conclusions of law were made and filed, and judgment was entered (1) discharging Pearl from further liability, (2) awarding the $28,067.87 to Western, (3) quieting Lack's title to all furniture, furnishings, linens, dishes and silver located in the building and to all restaurant equipment located in and not attached to the building, and (4) quieting Western's title to all other property, real and personal, hereinabove mentioned. From parts (2) and (4) of the judgment Lack has appealed. Parts (1) and (3) are not appealed from. The facts are as follows:
Prior to September 6, 1934, Western became the owner of the land and building hereinabove mentioned, and Lack became the owner of the furniture, furnishings, liens, dishes, silver and restaurant equipment located in the building. On September 6, 1934, Lack wrote Western a letter reading, in part, as follows:
* * *"
On October 30, 1934, Lack executed a bill of sale transferring to Western all furniture, furnishings, linens, dishes, silver and restaurant equipment then located or thereafter to be placed in the building. On November 10, 1934, Western and Lack executed a contract whereby Western leased all the property3 to Lack for the term of six years commencing January 1, 1935, and ending December 31, 1940, and granted him an option to purchase the property for $35,000. This was the contract of which Lack, in his action against Western, sought specific performance. The contract provided:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
United States v. 70.39 Acres of Land
...all the optionee need do to make the option effective, is to give the proper notice, Cates v. McNeil, supra, Lack v. Western Loan & Building Co., 9 Cir., 1943, 134 F.2d 1017, 1021. Sec. 258a, Title 40 U.S.C.A. requires, as one condition for the passing of title, the deposit of the estimated......
-
Lack v. Western Loan & Building Co.
...of Salt Lake City, Utah, for appellee. Before MATHEWS, HEALY and BONE, Circuit Judges. MATHEWS, Circuit Judge. In Lack v. Western Loan & Building Co., 9 Cir., 134 F.2d 1017, we reversed, in part, a judgment of the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of California a......
-
Shayeb v. Holland
... ... v. C. D. Kepner Leather Co. 317 ... Mass. 581 , 586 ... The ... to make alterations, to erect a building and to improve the ... premises. The parties ... of exercising the option. Lack v. Western Loan & Building ... Co. 134 F.2d ... ...
-
Royal Zenith Corp. v. Citizens Publications, Inc.
...seller's protection, and does so, plainly that insurer is intended to bear the loss as among the three parties. Lack v. Western Loan & Building Co., 134 F.2d 1017 (9 Cir.); Cir.); Annotation, 64 A.L.R.2d 1402, 1416. In the consignment situation, if the consignment contract recites as to the......